Separating variables within square root expressions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on techniques for isolating variables within square root expressions in differential equations (DEs). The user initially considers squaring both sides of an equation to eliminate the square root but realizes this approach leads to complications. They ultimately conclude that by substituting the known function y=y(x) into the equation, they can derive a more manageable expression that allows for integration with respect to x. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationships between variables in coupled systems. The user finds a solution, acknowledging the complexity but confirming its viability.
timsea81
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
Please see attached. This is a general question for a more complex thermo problem, but it fits this form. Are there any tricks to getting expressions out of square roots in solving DEs?

y=y(x)
x=x(t)

I want to get y by itself so I can integrate with respect to x, but it is trapped in a square root expression. My guess of squaring both sides and "squaring" the dx/dt term by making it a second derivative doesn't seem right, but it's all I can think up. Does anyone have any suggestions?
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0168.jpg
    IMAG0168.jpg
    18 KB · Views: 566
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have a coupled system:
<br /> \begin{array}{rcl}<br /> \frac{dx}{dt} &amp; = &amp; \sqrt{y-A} \\<br /> \frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}} &amp; = &amp; y-A<br /> \end{array}<br />
So this gives the ODE
<br /> \frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}=\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^{2}<br />
Let v=dx/dt, so:
<br /> \frac{dv}{dt}=v^{2}<br />
Can you take it from here?
 
Looking back on it I guess my original post was misleading.

The second derivative statement wasn't a given criteria, that was my first guess at how to solve the problem (squaring both sides but for the left hand side the squaring process involves taking it to its second derivative). That doesn't work, I tried it out with some real equations and thought about it some more and concluded it is pure nonsense.

I think I got it though. I know what y=y(x) is so I can plug it into the left hand side and get a complicated expression where x is the only variable and I can integrate. It's ugly, but it works.
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0169.jpg
    IMAG0169.jpg
    20.9 KB · Views: 494
The definition of y would have been helpful, but you did the right thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K