Undergrad Separation of variables - Getting the Fourier coefficients

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Fourier coefficients \(C_{m,n}\) for the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) using separation of variables. The proposed solution is given by \(u(x,y,t)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}C_{m,n}\cdot e^{-(m^2+n^2)\cdot t} \cdot \sin(m \cdot x) \cdot \cos(n \cdot y)\) with the domain \((x,y,t) \in (0,\pi) \times (0,\pi) \times (0,\infty)\). The Fourier coefficients are calculated using the Fourier Transform, but participants clarify that these coefficients should not depend on time and must be determined using initial conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series and Fourier coefficients
  • Knowledge of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with separation of variables technique
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Fourier coefficients in PDEs
  • Learn about initial conditions and their role in solving PDEs
  • Explore the application of the Fourier Transform in solving boundary value problems
  • Investigate common mistakes in applying separation of variables
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying partial differential equations, as well as researchers and practitioners looking to deepen their understanding of Fourier analysis in the context of PDEs.

NicolaiTheDane
Messages
100
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
Using separation of variables I have found a Fourier series to solve a PDE. How do I find the coefficients?
Hey there!

I am current taking an introductory course on PDE's, and our professor hasn't really emphasized last part of solutions from separation of variables. Now its not strictly going to be on the exam, however I remember doing this with ease a few years back, but for some reason now I simply cannot recall, or translate my books explanation into action. This below is the solution

$$u(x,y,t)=\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}C_{m,n}\cdot e^{-(m^2+n^2)\cdot t} \cdot \sin(m \cdot x) \cdot \cos(n \cdot y)$$

with ##(x,y,t) \in (0,\pi) \times (0,\pi) \times (0,\infty)##. I need an expression for ##C_{m,n}##, which seems pretty clear to me is the Fourier Coefficients. My attempt is to use the Fourier Transform:
$$C_{m,n}=\frac{1}{\pi} \cdot \int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{1}{\pi} \cdot \int_{0}^{\pi}u(x,y,t) \cdot e^{-i \cdot m \cdot x} \cdot e^{-i \cdot n \cdot y} dydx$$
However this seems odd. Can someone enlighten me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your coefficients ##C_{n,m}## cannot depend on time. You need to use the initial condition to fix them.
 
Interesting, as the assignment I'm doing atm, askes for en expression of for ##C_{m,n}##, before going on to ask for the use of initial conditions in a later sub assignment. If I had taking time into account. Then what do I do?
 
I think there's a typo in your expression for ##u## since ##y## does not appear in the RSH. Could you post the problem that you're working on?

It's possible that you're looking for a solution of the form ##\sum_{n,m} c_{nm}(t)X_n(x)Y_m(y)## but in the expression that you have, it looks likely that the ##c_{nm}## are constants since a typical function of ##t## already appears.
 
Infrared said:
I think there's a typo in your expression for ##u## since ##y## does not appear in the RSH. Could you post the problem that you're working on?

It's possible that you're looking for a solution of the form ##\sum_{n,m} c_{nm}(t)X_n(x)Y_m(y)## but in the expression that you have, it looks likely that the ##c_{nm}## are constants since a typical function of ##t## already appears.

Yes I have made a correction. There should be a y in the cos function. ##C_{m,n}## shouldn't just look like it, they are constants, depending entirely on n and m. Also that is the problem I'm working on.

EDIT: If you wanted the original, problem here it is:
1576613917629.png
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
894
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K