Prove Sequence Convergence: {xn} Goes to Zero

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence {xn} of positive numbers converges to zero under the condition that there exists a constant c, where 0 < c < 1, such that the ratio [xn+1]/[xn] < c for all n in Z+. The sequence is shown to be bounded and strictly decreasing, which confirms that it converges. By demonstrating that c^n approaches zero and applying the Squeeze Theorem, it is established that {xn} also approaches zero as n approaches infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequences and series in mathematics
  • Familiarity with the Squeeze Theorem
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Concept of monotonic sequences and their convergence criteria
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monotonic sequences and their convergence
  • Learn about the Squeeze Theorem in detail
  • Explore logarithmic functions and their applications in limits
  • Investigate the behavior of sequences defined by recursive relations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying real analysis or sequences and series will benefit from this discussion.

scooterboot1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose {xn} is a sequence of positive numbers for which there exists c, 0<c<1, such that ([x][/n+1])/([x][/n])<c for all n in Z+. Prove that [x][/n] goes to zero.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Let the first term of {xn} be x, where n=1. Then by the given, [x][/n+1]/[x][/n]<1, therefore, [x][/1]>[x][/2]>[x][/3]>...>[x][/n]>[x][/n+1], hence sup{[x][/n]} = [x][/1].
By the given, inf{[x][/n]}=0 so {xn} is bounded and strictly decreasing. We know a monotone sequence converges if and only if it is bounded, but I am having trouble proving that {xn} goes to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know why lim n->infinity of c^n goes to 0? Hint: take the log.
 
I understand why lim n -> ∞ c^n = 0, but I don't understand how it relates to the problem. I need to determine why {xn} goes to zero
 
x1<c*x0. x2<c*x1<c*(c*x0)=c^2*x0. x3<c*x2<c*(c^2*x0)=c^3*x0. Following?
 
since i can show that c^n*x0>xn and since c^n -> 0 then I can use the squeeze theorem to show that {xn} goes to zero...
just want to make sure I made sense of that correctly
 
scooterboot1 said:
since i can show that c^n*x0>xn and since c^n -> 0 then I can use the squeeze theorem to show that {xn} goes to zero...
just want to make sure I made sense of that correctly

Sure. That's it.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K