Sequences that satisfay the same recurrence relation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence defined by the formula an = 3n + 1 satisfies the recurrence relation ak = ak-1 + 3 for all integers k ≥ 1. The derivation involves substituting the expression for an-1 into the recurrence relation, leading to the conclusion that ak = 3k + 1. The key insight is recognizing that the difference an - an-1 equals 3, confirming the recurrence relation holds true. This understanding is crucial for solving similar problems involving linear recurrence relations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear recurrence relations
  • Familiarity with sequences and series
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction (optional for deeper understanding)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study linear recurrence relations in-depth
  • Learn about mathematical induction techniques
  • Explore the properties of arithmetic sequences
  • Practice problems involving sequences defined by explicit formulas
USEFUL FOR

Students studying discrete mathematics, educators teaching sequences and series, and anyone interested in understanding recurrence relations in mathematical contexts.

Jim01
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let a0, a1, a2..., be defined by the formula an = 3n + 1, for all integers n >= 0. Show that this sequence satisfies the recurrence relation ak = ak-1 + 3, for all integers k >=1.



Homework Equations



for all integers n >= 0, an = 3n + 1

for all integers k >= 1, ak = ak-1 + 3



The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to proceed. In the one example given us in the book, we are given the initial conditions for each sequence (a1 = 2 and b1 = 1) and the formulas are exactly the same except that one is ak = 3ak-1 and the other is bk = 3bk-1. I am unable to relate the example in thge book to the question.

I have looked on youtube but can only find videos on how to compute terms of a recursively defined sequence, which I know how to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jim01! :smile:

If an = 3n + 1,

what is an-1 ?

And so what is an - an-1 ? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Jim01! :smile:

If an = 3n + 1,

what is an-1 ?

And so what is an - an-1 ? :wink:

If I am understanding you correctly, then

If an = 3n + 1,

then

an-1 = 3(n - 1) + 1
= 3n - 3 + 1
= 3n - 2

therefore

an - an-1 = 3n + 1 - 3n - 2
= -1

I'm sorry for being so thick-headed but I don't know what this is telling me.
 
Jim01 said:
If I am understanding you correctly, then

If an = 3n + 1,

then

an-1 = 3(n - 1) + 1
= 3n - 3 + 1
= 3n - 2

therefore

an - an-1 = 3n + 1 - 3n - 2
= -1

I'm sorry for being so thick-headed but I don't know what this is telling me.

OK. I think I may get it. The first thing you did was to make all the subscripts the same, so that a0, a1, a3, ... is defined by ak = 3k + 1 and ak-1 = 3(k - 1) + 1. I didn't know you could do that, although since the letters are arbitrary, it makes sense.

You then input the answer to ak-1 into the the formula ak = ak-1 + 3.

so ak-1 + 3
= 3(k - 1) + 1 + 3
= 3k - 3 + 1 + 3
= 3k + 1
= ak

Ok. I got it. Thank you very much.
 
Jim01 said:
If I am understanding you correctly, then

If an = 3n + 1,

then

an-1 = 3(n - 1) + 1
= 3n - 3 + 1
= 3n - 2

therefore

an - an-1 = 3n + 1 - 3n - 2
= -1
Your subtraction is wrong. You want 3n+1- (3n-2)= 3n+1- 3n+ 2= 3, not -1.

I'm sorry for being so thick-headed but I don't know what this is telling me.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Your subtraction is wrong. You want 3n+1- (3n-2)= 3n+1- 3n+ 2= 3, not -1.

You are absolutely correct. Thank you for pointing that out to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
934
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K