Series Convergence: Is 1/k(ln(k)) Converging or Diverging?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndnbolla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series defined by the term 1/k(ln(k)) from k=2 to infinity diverges. The integral test was applied, transforming the series into the integral of 1/k(ln(k)), which evaluates to ln(ln(k)). As k approaches infinity, ln(ln(k)) also approaches infinity, confirming divergence. The series does not converge absolutely or conditionally, as the positive term 1/k(ln(k)) is positive for all k>1, and comparisons with known convergent and divergent series reinforce this conclusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence and divergence
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Experience with comparison tests for series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Integral Test for convergence of series
  • Learn about the Comparison Test for series convergence
  • Explore the properties of logarithmic functions in calculus
  • Investigate other series with logarithmic terms, such as 1/k^p for various p values
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, educators, and anyone interested in series analysis and convergence tests.

ndnbolla
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
The series is from k=2 to infinity.

the term is 1/k(ln(k)).

What I did was change the term to an integral... int(1/k(ln(k)) and solved it.

I came up with ln(ln(k)).

If I plug in infinty, then ln(ln(k)) goes to infinity so that means it diverges right.

From the original graph of 1/k(ln(k)), it seems like it converges but it doesn't.

Am I doing something wrong in my math? The original question asks if the series converges absolutely, conditionally, or diverges.

The positive term (to check for absolute convergence) is already the whole term itself right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First an obvious point, 1/kln(k) is positive for all k>1 so if the series converges, it converges absolutely, not conditionally.

\Sum \frac{1}{n} diverges, \Sum \frac{1}{k^2} converges and \frac{1}{k^2} \le \frac{1}{k ln(k)} \le \frac{1}{k} so that (or looking at the graph) doesn't tell us anything!

To integrate \int \frac{1}{x ln(x)}dx let u= ln(x) (as I presume you did). Then du= \frac{1}{x}dx so the integral becomes \int \frac{1}{u}du= ln(u)= ln(ln(x)) as you say.
That does not converge as x goes to infinity and so the series does not converge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K