Series Solutions of Second Order Linear Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a second-order linear differential equation using power series methods. The original poster presents a specific equation and attempts to express the solution as a power series, raising concerns about matching the exponents of the terms after differentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a power series solution but encounters difficulties with the summation limits and exponents. Some participants suggest separating terms to maintain consistency in the summation indices. Others discuss the implications of the recurrence relation derived from the coefficients of the power series.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different methods to handle the power series and the associated recurrence relations. Suggestions have been made to rewrite the summations to facilitate finding a solution, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on finding the first few terms of the series solutions and the potential for the series to terminate early. The discussion also highlights the complexity of handling initial terms separately and the need for clarity in the summation process.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



(1+x2)y'' - 4xy' + 6y = 0

Homework Equations



I'm going to assume y can be written as [n=0 to ∞] ∑anxn

The Attempt at a Solution



y = [n=0 to ∞] ∑anxn

----> y' = [n=0 to ∞] ∑(n+1)an+1xn
----> y'' = [n=0 to ∞] ∑(n+2)(n+1)an+2xn

----> (1+x2)∑(n+2)(n+1)an+2xn -4x∑(n+1)an+1xn + 6∑(n+1)an+1xn = 0.

My problem is that, after multiplying out the functions in front of y,y',y'', everything is summed from n=0 to ∞ but the the exponents on the x's don't match up. For example, one term looks like ∑(n+1)(n+2)an+2xn+2. I can't just do a transformation j=n+2, making it

[j=-2 to ∞] ∑(j-1)jajxj = (-3)(-2)a-2x-2 + (-2)(-1)a-1x-1 + 0 + 0 + (1)(2)a2x2 + (2)(3)a3x3 + ...

because then I have those darned a-2,a-1 that screw everything up. In other words, I want everything summed from n=0 to ∞ and only xn being summed. Then I can figure out the recurrence relation, the radius of convergence, etc. Suggestions are appreciated.

NEXT QUESTION:

On another problem, I was able to get to the point of

[n=0 to ∞] ∑xn{(n+2)(n+1)an+2 + nan + 2an}=0.

For this equation to be satisfied for all x, the coefficient of each power of x must be zero; hence I conclude that

(n+2)(n+1)an+2 + nan + 2an = 0.

I'm now trying to figure out the recurrence relationship.

I write out

2a0 + 2a2 = 0 -----> a2=-a0
3a1 + 6a3 = 0 ------> a3=(-1/2)a1
4a2 + 6a3 = 0 ------> a4=-(1/3)a2=(1/3)a0
5a3 + 2a5 = 0 ------> a5=-(1/4)a3=(1/8)a1
6a4 + 30a6 = 0 -----> a6=-(1/5)a4=(-1/15)a0
7a5 + 42a7 = 0 ------>a7=(-1/6)a5=(-1/48)a1

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

---------> an = a2k = (-1)k * a0/((2k-1)(2k-3)) ?

I dunno. Does that seem right? I'm just trying to figure it out in my head. Supposing this is correct, what then do I do with the a2k+1 stuff--you know, the a1,a3,a5,...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamin2112 said:
My problem is that, after multiplying out the functions in front of y,y',y'', everything is summed from n=0 to ∞ but the the exponents on the x's don't match up. For example, one term looks like ∑(n+1)(n+2)an+2xn+2. I can't just do a transformation j=n+2, making it

[j=-2 to ∞] ∑(j-1)jajxj = (-3)(-2)a-2x-2 + (-2)(-1)a-1x-1 + 0 + 0 + (1)(2)a2x2 + (2)(3)a3x3 + ...

because then I have those darned a-2,a-1 that screw everything up. In other words, I want everything summed from n=0 to ∞ and only xn being summed. Then I can figure out the recurrence relation, the radius of convergence, etc. Suggestions are appreciated.
The reason you probably can't do it is because it's often impossible. The first few terms typically have to be treated separately as special cases.
On another problem, I was able to get to the point of

[n=0 to ∞] ∑xn{(n+2)(n+1)an+2 + nan + 2an}=0.

For this equation to be satisfied for all x, the coefficient of each power of x must be zero; hence I conclude that

(n+2)(n+1)an+2 + nan + 2an = 0.
Note you can rewrite this as

[tex]a_{n+2} = -\frac{1}{n+1} a_n[/tex]

So the coefficient of the even powers of x will be proportional to a0 and the coefficient of the odd powers of x will be proportional to a1. The series proportional to a0 is one solution, and the series proportional to a1 is the other solution.
 
vela said:
The reason you probably can't do it is because it's often impossible. The first few terms typically have to be treated separately as special cases.

So where do I go from here?

I've been told to:

Solve the given differential equation using a power series about x0=0. Find the recursion relation and find the first four terms in each of the two linearly independent solutions (unless the series terminates sooner). If possible, find the general term in each solution.
 
I think what's confusing you is you're trying to make the limits on the summations match up too early. What you want to do instead is make all the sums contain xn. For instance, the first term gives you

[tex](1+x^2)y'' = \sum_{n=2}^\infty n(n-1)a_n x^{n-2} + \sum_{n=2}^\infty n(n-1)a_n x^n[/tex]

Now let k=n-2, and rewrite the first sum in terms of k:

[tex](1+x^2)y'' = \sum_{k=0}^\infty (k+2)(k+1)a_{k+2} x^k + \sum_{n=2}^\infty n(n-1)a_n x^n[/tex]

The first summation will contribute x0 and x1 terms while the second does not, so separate those two out and write the rest as one summation to get:

[tex](1+x^2)y'' = 2a_2 + 6a_3 x + \sum_{n=2}^\infty [(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2}+n(n-1)a_n] x^n[/tex]
 
vela said:
I think what's confusing you is you're trying to make the limits on the summations match up too early. What you want to do instead is make all the sums contain xn. For instance, the first term gives you

[tex](1+x^2)y'' = \sum_{n=2}^\infty n(n-1)a_n x^{n-2} + \sum_{n=2}^\infty n(n-1)a_n x^n[/tex]

Now let k=n-2, and rewrite the first sum in terms of k:

[tex](1+x^2)y'' = \sum_{k=0}^\infty (k+2)(k+1)a_{k+2} x^k + \sum_{n=2}^\infty n(n-1)a_n x^n[/tex]

The first summation will contribute x0 and x1 terms while the second does not, so separate those two out and write the rest as one summation to get:

[tex](1+x^2)y'' = 2a_2 + 6a_3 x + \sum_{n=2}^\infty [(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2}+n(n-1)a_n] x^n[/tex]

Hmmm... I'll try this and get back to you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K