Serway Physics for Scientists & Engineers

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around opinions and experiences regarding the textbook "Serway Physics for Scientists & Engineers." Participants evaluate its effectiveness in teaching physics concepts, comparing it to other textbooks such as Halliday's "Fundamentals of Physics" and Sears and Zemansky's "University Physics." The scope includes conceptual understanding, pedagogical effectiveness, and personal preferences in learning materials.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that "Serway" relies heavily on formula application without sufficient explanation of underlying concepts.
  • Others share that they found "Serway" verbose and filled with examples that do not effectively aid in understanding related problems.
  • A participant mentions using "Serway" due to a lack of mathematical background for another textbook, suggesting that it may be more accessible for some learners.
  • Several participants favor Halliday's textbook over "Serway," citing clearer explanations and better overall presentation.
  • One participant notes dissatisfaction with the thermodynamics section of "Serway," finding it unclear compared to Sears and Zemansky's text.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express dissatisfaction with "Serway," but there is no consensus on its overall value, as some still find it usable. Multiple competing views exist regarding the effectiveness of "Serway" compared to other textbooks.

Contextual Notes

Participants' opinions are influenced by their individual learning styles and backgrounds, which may affect their perceptions of the textbooks discussed.

member 392791
What do you all think of this textbook? It seems to me to be a lot of plug in chug to get formulas without an explanation for the motivation and just a lot of algebra
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I was starting my studies I checked it out, can't say I liked it that much either.
 
We are using it in my physics classes. To me it is super verbose with the weirdest examples that don't really give you an idea on doing other problems of the topic.

A lot of people on the forum seems to like the book by Halliday: Fundamentals of Physics.

Also have a look at the different books in the library that fits your way of learning.
 
I'm using it at the moment, not great but still usable. Only using it cause I lack the mathematical background for K&K's mechanics book. I think most standard first-year textbooks are like that...though I've read through bits of the 7th edition of Sears and Zermansky's 'University Physics' and liked their explanations better than Serway's text, short but clear (e.g. in Serway's book, the thermodynamics part wasn't clear at all, S&Z's text was shorter for that part but made much more sense)
 
I'd add a plus 1 to Halliday to. The Serway book pissed me off a lot because I felt like it tried to sound as mega smart as possible when explaining simple concepts like what capcitance is dependent on for example...
 
I've read through the Mechanics section for both Serway and Halliday, and I got to say I like the Halliday text better. I felt that the overall presentation of Halliday was better
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K