MHB Set Problems: Is My Statement about Circles True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaychay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between subsets and elements in set theory. It confirms that the empty set, denoted as $\emptyset$, is a subset of every set, including $\{1, 2, 3\}$. However, $\emptyset$ is not an element of the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$. The participants agree on these definitions, reinforcing the understanding of set relationships. This highlights the importance of accurately interpreting set properties in mathematical statements.
jaychay
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Untitled v.png


Is the statement that I have circle is true ?
Because I feel like the solution in my textbook is wrong, I only learn that empty set is a subset of every set but it is not an element of a set.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You are right: $\emptyset$ is not an element of $\{1, 2, 3\}$. The only elements of that set are 1, 2 and 3.
 
Of course, the empty set, $\phi$, is a subset of every set so it is true that $\phi\subset \{1, 2, 3\}$.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K