MHB Seth's question via email about a Laplace Transform

AI Thread Summary
The Laplace Transform of the function \( 36\left[ \frac{\cosh{\left( 4\,t \right) } - 1}{t} \right] \) is derived using the property for transforms of the form \( \frac{f(t)}{t} \). The function \( f(t) \) is identified as \( \cosh{\left( 4\,t \right)} - 1 \), leading to the transform \( F(s) = \frac{s}{s^2 - 16} - \frac{1}{s} \). The integral for the Laplace Transform is evaluated, resulting in the expression \( -\frac{1}{2} \ln{\left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right|} \). The final result must include the factor of 36, confirming the correct application of the transform.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Find the Laplace Transform of $\displaystyle 36\left[ \frac{\cosh{\left( 4\,t \right) } - 1}{t} \right] $.

Since this is of the form $\displaystyle \frac{f\left( t \right)}{t} $ we should use $\displaystyle \mathcal{L}\,\left\{ \frac{f\left( t \right) }{t} \right\} = \int_s^{\infty}{F\left( u \right) \,\mathrm{d}u } $.

Here $\displaystyle f\left( t \right) = \cosh{\left( 4\,t \right) } - 1 $ and so

$\displaystyle F\left( s \right) = \frac{s}{s^2 - 16} - \frac{1}{s} $

Therefore

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{L}\,\left\{ \frac{\cosh{\left( 4\,t \right) } - 1}{t} \right\} &= \int_s^{\infty}{ \left( \frac{u}{u^2 - 16} - \frac{1}{u} \right) \,\mathrm{d}u } \\
&= \lim_{b \to \infty}\int_s^b{ \left( \frac{u}{u^2 - 16} - \frac{1}{u} \right) \,\mathrm{d}u } \\
&= \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \frac{1}{2}\,\ln{\left| u^2 - 16 \right| } - \ln{\left| u \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| u^2 - 16 \right| } - 2\,\ln{ \left| u \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| u^2 - 16 \right| } - \ln{ \left| u^2 \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| \frac{u^2 - 16}{u^2} \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{u^2} \right| } \right] _s^b \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left\{ \lim_{b \to \infty} \left[ \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{b^2} \right| } \right] - \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right| }\right\} \\ &= \frac{1}{2} \left( \ln{ \left| 1 - 0 \right| } - \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right| } \right) \\
&= \frac{1}{2} \left( 0 - \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right| } \right) \\ &= -\frac{1}{2} \, \ln{ \left| 1 - \frac{16}{s^2} \right| } \end{align*} $
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That seems correct to me, I check the tables, you forgot the factor of 36 out front tho.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top