The discussion confirms that for three sets A, B, and C, the expression A(B\C) equals (AB)\C and also equals B(A\C). This equality is derived from the definition of set difference. All three expressions ultimately represent the intersection of sets A and B with the complement of set C, denoted as A∩B∩C̅. The participants agree on the correctness of these set operations. Understanding these relationships is essential for working with set theory effectively.
#1
Fermat1
180
0
Am I right in thinking that if we have 3 sets A,B,C, then with A intersect B represented as AB, we have:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes.
I have seen that this is an important subject in maths
My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to?
I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Greg tells me the feature to generate a new insight announcement is broken, so I am doing this:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/fixing-things-which-can-go-wrong-with-complex-numbers/
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/
by...