I've come across a problem with my least squares fits and I think someone else must have analyzed this, but I don't know where to find it.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have a converged least squares fit of my spectroscopic data. Unfortunately, the physical model, on which the fit is based, is mediocre. The deviations between measurement and model are much larger than the statistical errors at each data point. There is almost certainly nothing I can do about that. The fit reproduces the data reasonably well, but the model is incomplete.

I know that there are some parameters inside the model, which do not seem to be very robust. If I fit only half of my data (only s or only p polarization), they always come out differently. Other parameters remain totally unchanged.

I'm looking basically for an idea on how I could quantify this "robustness". It can probably been done based on some sort of artificial perturbation function, but I haven't seen anything like that.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Shaky model in least squares fit

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Shaky model least |
---|

A Confused about Weighted Least Squares |

B Least / Smallest / Minimum Detectable Difference |

I Fitting two models in sequence with parameters in common |

A Transcription from SQL to FOL (First Order Logic) |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**