Sheldon Axler's "Algebra & Trigonometry" vs. "Precalculus: A Prelude."

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on comparing Sheldon Axler's "Algebra & Trigonometry" and "Precalculus: A Prelude," focusing on their content, structure, and suitability for different learners. Participants explore the differences in approach, depth, and intended audience, as well as their own experiences with these texts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the "Algebra & Trigonometry" book appears to have more content, particularly in the chapter on systems of equations, compared to the "Precalculus" book.
  • There is a suggestion that both books are proof-based, but the "Algebra & Trigonometry" book may be more accessible for younger students.
  • One participant expresses a preference for succinct texts without excessive exercises or illustrations, indicating that Axler's style aligns with their needs.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of a separate "Precalculus" book when "Algebra & Trigonometry" already covers similar material.
  • Lang's book is mentioned as a potential alternative, with some participants asserting it covers all necessary material for studying calculus and higher mathematics.
  • Concerns are raised about the appropriateness of proof-based learning for younger students, with a call for more engaging and accessible methods for early learners.
  • Participants share personal backgrounds and motivations for reviewing precalculus material, highlighting the diversity of learner experiences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the suitability of the books for various audiences, particularly regarding younger learners versus adult students. There is no consensus on which book is definitively better, as preferences vary based on individual learning styles and backgrounds.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the challenges of navigating numerous mathematics textbooks, indicating a perceived decline in quality or clarity in recent publications. There are also references to the specific needs of adult learners returning to mathematics after a long hiatus.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for adult learners seeking to review precalculus concepts, educators considering textbooks for younger students, and anyone interested in the comparative analysis of mathematics resources.

  • #31
Yes, I can imagine the early edition of Thomas and even Stewart were probably a lot better. But I've already settled on Spivak and like it just fine. Remember, for me, this is more review as I've taken a lot of math before and done well. But I want something more heavy to supplement the easy/computational Stewart book. Early Thomas, while most surely better, is I would think in my intermediate list of books. And that is redundant for me. I want more in-depth, theory, and analysis. Spivak is a nice supplement IMO so far. I've done proofs before, so books like "How to Solve It" won't be too helpful. Spivak is nice because the problems are challenging. The text itself is easy to read through. Same goes for Apostol, though Apostol is more thorough. So I would recommend an intermediate book to a serious beginner, but for someone that's gone through it a long time ago, and needs to use a computational book for refreshing, then the better supplement is Spivak or Apostol which go deep and make you think.
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
19K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
11K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K