I Shell structure topological defects as substitute for dark matter

AI Thread Summary
A recent paper proposes that massless topological defects, or shells, could bind galaxies as an alternative to dark matter. It raises questions about the nature of gravitational forces in these shells compared to traditional Newtonian gravity, suggesting that the force may be localized in spacetime. The paper indicates that to achieve flat rotation curves in galaxies, larger concentric shells would need to possess greater mass to exert consistent gravitational force on stars at varying distances. Critics argue that the concept relies on combining ordinary matter with exotic matter, which lacks a clear source. Overall, the discussion highlights skepticism about the feasibility of using massless shells to explain galactic binding without addressing the exotic matter issue.
Ranku
Messages
433
Reaction score
18
Recently a paper was published 'The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects' which proposes how 'massless' shells can bind galaxies in lieu of dark matter. There are a few basic technical details I am looking to clarify:

1. It is mentioned in the paper that an attractive force is exerted on a test particle riding a zero-mass shell. So, is the basic difference between Newtonian gravitational force and gravitational force in a shell, that in which the former propagates through spacetime, while the latter is entirely localized in spacetime?

2. The gravitational force decreases as 1/r in a massless shell. In order to produce a flat rotation curve in galaxies, does that therefore require each larger concentric shell to have greater mass, so that the gravitational force of the shells can act with the same magnitude upon stars at all distances in galaxies?

3. The paper seeks to offer an alternative to dark matter. But could it be also possible that dark matter particles are themselves miniature versions of massless shells?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Link appears to go to a file on your desktop, not the paper.
 
Ibix said:
Link appears to go to a file on your desktop, not the paper.
Oops: corrected.
 
Ranku said:
Recently a paper was published 'The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects' which proposes how 'massless' shells can bind galaxies in lieu of dark matter.
This paper appears quite "hand wavy" to me. The proposed spherical shells are massless only because they combine shells of ordinary matter with shells of negative mass density, i.e., shells of exotic matter. Given the novel properties of gravitational systems incorporating exotic matter (stable wormholes, Alcubierre warp drive, etc.), it's no surprise that one can arrange to get a galactic 1/r potential this way. But as far as I can see, the author offers no explanation for the source of this exotic matter.
 
Last edited:
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Featured
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top