I Shell structure topological defects as substitute for dark matter

AI Thread Summary
A recent paper proposes that massless topological defects, or shells, could bind galaxies as an alternative to dark matter. It raises questions about the nature of gravitational forces in these shells compared to traditional Newtonian gravity, suggesting that the force may be localized in spacetime. The paper indicates that to achieve flat rotation curves in galaxies, larger concentric shells would need to possess greater mass to exert consistent gravitational force on stars at varying distances. Critics argue that the concept relies on combining ordinary matter with exotic matter, which lacks a clear source. Overall, the discussion highlights skepticism about the feasibility of using massless shells to explain galactic binding without addressing the exotic matter issue.
Ranku
Messages
433
Reaction score
18
Recently a paper was published 'The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects' which proposes how 'massless' shells can bind galaxies in lieu of dark matter. There are a few basic technical details I am looking to clarify:

1. It is mentioned in the paper that an attractive force is exerted on a test particle riding a zero-mass shell. So, is the basic difference between Newtonian gravitational force and gravitational force in a shell, that in which the former propagates through spacetime, while the latter is entirely localized in spacetime?

2. The gravitational force decreases as 1/r in a massless shell. In order to produce a flat rotation curve in galaxies, does that therefore require each larger concentric shell to have greater mass, so that the gravitational force of the shells can act with the same magnitude upon stars at all distances in galaxies?

3. The paper seeks to offer an alternative to dark matter. But could it be also possible that dark matter particles are themselves miniature versions of massless shells?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Link appears to go to a file on your desktop, not the paper.
 
Ibix said:
Link appears to go to a file on your desktop, not the paper.
Oops: corrected.
 
Ranku said:
Recently a paper was published 'The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defects' which proposes how 'massless' shells can bind galaxies in lieu of dark matter.
This paper appears quite "hand wavy" to me. The proposed spherical shells are massless only because they combine shells of ordinary matter with shells of negative mass density, i.e., shells of exotic matter. Given the novel properties of gravitational systems incorporating exotic matter (stable wormholes, Alcubierre warp drive, etc.), it's no surprise that one can arrange to get a galactic 1/r potential this way. But as far as I can see, the author offers no explanation for the source of this exotic matter.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Featured
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top