Shifting coordinate system in 2D solving simultaneous equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around transforming coordinates in a 2D space, specifically reversing the relationships between original coordinates (A_x, A_y) and transformed coordinates (A_x', A_y') after a rotation by an angle θ. The original poster attempts to derive the expressions for A_x and A_y in terms of A_x' and A_y', but encounters difficulties in the algebraic manipulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss rearranging equations and substituting variables to express A_x and A_y in terms of A_x' and A_y'. Some participants question the correctness of algebraic steps and suggest using Cramer's Rule as a potential method for solving the simultaneous equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various methods and questioning the validity of certain algebraic manipulations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of trigonometric identities and the implications of notation, but no consensus or final solution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster may be missing a useful trigonometric identity or has made an algebraic error, but these aspects remain unresolved within the discussion.

SUDOnym
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
When in 2D, the coordinates of a place in space vary depending on the coordinate axes that are being used given by:

[tex]A_{x}^{\prime}=A_{x}\cos\theta+A_{y}\sin\theta[/tex] (1)

and

[tex]A_{y}^{\prime}=-A_{x}\sin\theta+A_{y}\cos\theta[/tex] (2)

Now I am trying to reverse it - to show what A_x and A_y are in terms of A_x' and A_y'..This is a simple simultaneous eqtn but I cannot get to the result that I know is the correct answer, the following is the relationship I wish to show:

[tex]A_{x}=A_{x}^{\prime}\cos\theta-A_{y}^{\prime}\sin\theta[/tex] (3)My attempt:

firstly, rearrange equation (1) to get:

[tex]A_{y}=\frac{-A_{x}\cos\theta+A_{x}^{\prime}}{\sin\theta}[/tex] (4)

now plug (4) into (2) to eliminate A_y:

[tex]A_{y}^{\prime}=-A_{x}\sin\theta+A_{x}^{\prime}\arctan\theta-A_{x}\cos\theta\arctan\theta[/tex] (5)

(From now on I stop putting in the thetas for speed..)

[tex]\implies A_{y}^{\prime}\tan=-A_{x}\sin\tan-A_{x}\cos+A_{x}^{\prime}[/tex] (6)

[tex]\implies\frac{A_{y}^{\prime}\tan-A_{x}^{\prime}}{cos}=-A_{x}\tan^{2}-A_{x}[/tex] (7)I cannot not see how to progress after this point...I don't know if I have made a mistake in the algebra (although I have checked a few times) or if I am missing a useful trig identity.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could use Cramer's Rule to solve for A_x and A_y in terms of A'_x and A'_y. In Cramer's Rule, you need to divide through by the determinant of the coefficient matrix. What is that determinant in your case?

RGV
 
SUDOnym said:
When in 2D, the coordinates of a place in space vary depending on the coordinate axes that are being used given by:

[tex]A_{x}^{\prime}=A_{x}\cos\theta+A_{y}\sin\theta[/tex] (1)

and

[tex]A_{y}^{\prime}=-A_{x}\sin\theta+A_{y}\cos\theta[/tex] (2)

Now I am trying to reverse it - to show what A_x and A_y are in terms of A_x' and A_y'..This is a simple simultaneous eqtn but I cannot get to the result that I know is the correct answer, the following is the relationship I wish to show:

[tex]A_{x}=A_{x}^{\prime}\cos\theta-A_{y}^{\prime}\sin\theta[/tex] (3)


My attempt:

firstly, rearrange equation (1) to get:

[tex]A_{y}=\frac{-A_{x}\cos\theta+A_{x}^{\prime}}{\sin\theta}[/tex] (4)
Fine up to here, but then...
now plug (4) into (2) to eliminate A_y:

[tex]A_{y}^{\prime}=-A_{x}\sin\theta+A_{x}^{\prime}\arctan\theta-A_{x}\cos\theta\arctan\theta[/tex] (5)
This is wrong. [itex]\cos\theta/\sin\theta[/itex] does not equal [itex]\arctan\theta[/itex]. Notation-wise, this is how it works:
[tex]\begin{align}<br /> \tan^{-1} x & \Leftrightarrow \arctan x \\<br /> (\tan x)^{-1} & \Leftrightarrow 1/\tan x<br /> \end{align}[/tex]
It's confusing because [itex]\tan^2 x[/itex] does mean [itex](\tan x)^2[/itex]. It's just one of those inconsistencies in common notation you have to learn and be aware of.

In this problem, you might as well leave everything in terms of sine and cosine since that's what you want in the end anyway.
(From now on I stop putting in the thetas for speed..)

[tex]\implies A_{y}^{\prime}\tan=-A_{x}\sin\tan-A_{x}\cos+A_{x}^{\prime}[/tex] (6)

[tex]\implies\frac{A_{y}^{\prime}\tan-A_{x}^{\prime}}{cos}=-A_{x}\tan^{2}-A_{x}[/tex] (7)


I cannot not see how to progress after this point...I don't know if I have made a mistake in the algebra (although I have checked a few times) or if I am missing a useful trig identity.
If you factor the RHS of equation (7), you get [itex]-(\tan^2\theta+1)A_x[/itex]. You can simplify that using a trig identity.
 
Not clear how you know the thing you wish to show, but it is usually an advantage in a math problem to know the answer.

I think the suggested methods are worth working through. However surely simpler wouldn't it be to say: you already have the formulae for the new co-ordinates (A'x, A'y) of a point whose co-ordinates with respect to the previous co-ordinates were (Ax. Ay) after rotation through θ.

This pair of formulae are general for any 2-D rotation.

So now what is it you have to find? The formulae for the new co-ordinates (Ax, Ay)of a point whose co-ordinates with respect to the previous co-ordinates were (A'x. A'y) after rotation through -θ. So apply your general formula and it is pretty immediate.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K