SHM(mass suspended vertically on spring)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nrweis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the period of oscillation for a mass suspended on a vertical spring, specifically when the mass falls 3.42 cm before coming to rest. The correct formula for the period T is derived as T = 2π√(Δx/g), where Δx represents the displacement (3.42 cm) and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²). The final answer for the period is confirmed to be 0.262 seconds. The confusion arose from the misunderstanding of Δx as the amplitude rather than the equilibrium position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic knowledge of oscillatory motion and period calculation
  • Familiarity with gravitational acceleration (g = 9.8 m/s²)
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations involving square roots and π
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the period of oscillation for simple harmonic motion
  • Learn about the relationship between mass, spring constant, and oscillation frequency
  • Explore the effects of damping on oscillatory motion
  • Investigate real-world applications of springs in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to springs and harmonic motion.

nrweis
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object is hung on the end of a vertical spring and is released from rest with the spring unstressed. If the object falls 3.42 cm before coming to rest, find the period of the resulting oscillatory motion.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This was a homework question given and the answer is in the back of the book and it says
T = .262 seconds. Now i have no clue how they got this because I thought that the period was related to the spring constant and the mass but not to the amplitude so how can we find T if neither k nor m is given?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nrweis said:
so how can we find T if neither k nor m is given?

Hi nrweis, welcome to PF!

You can deduce something about them from the restoring force that is required to balance the object's weight.
 
Welcome to PF.

You don't necessarily need m and k, because don't you also know that

a(t) = ω2*x(t)

Won't a(t) = 9.8 at x/2 from the dead weight equilibrium point, which is at the peak of its oscillation?

Since ω = 2πf = 2π/T ...
 
Ok I thought about it for a while and thought I was on the right track but still got it wrong. This is what i did:

F=k∆x
mg=k∆x

√(g/∆x)= √(k/m)=ω=2π(1/T)

√(g/∆x)= 2π(1/T)

T=2π√(∆x/g)

and I got like .37 seconds.
Was I on the right track?
 
now I'm all confused. I was thinking that delta x was the amplitude
 
ok I just misunderstood the question. When I divided the 3.42 cm by 2 and reentered it to the formula I got the right answer. Thanks guys.
 
nrweis said:
now I'm all confused. I was thinking that delta x was the amplitude

Yes. Δx is the amplitude, but the x-position function which expresses x as a function of time is only x/2 distant from the mid point.

Congrats on figuring it out.
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K