SHM question with no other details

  • Thread starter Thread starter hemetite
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents a problem involving a block resting on a plate that undergoes vertical simple harmonic motion with a specified period. The task is to determine the maximum amplitude of the motion while maintaining contact between the block and the plate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the plate's velocity, amplitude, and the conditions under which the block remains in contact with the plate. There are attempts to derive equations related to acceleration and displacement, and questions arise about the implications of maximum acceleration and the role of gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants sharing their reasoning and equations, while some express confusion regarding the calculations. Guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between acceleration and amplitude, and the importance of the cosine function at maximum amplitude has been highlighted. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of the problem with limited initial details. The discussion includes assumptions about the sinusoidal nature of the plate's motion and the effects of gravitational acceleration on the block's behavior.

hemetite
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Qns: A block rest on a flat plate that executes vertical simple harmonic motion with a period of 1.5s. What is the maximum amplitude of the motion if the block were to be in contact with the plate thoughout the motion?

Can help me how to start?...there is not much details in this questions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You really don't need anymore detail than what the question gives. You need to find out how fast can the flat plate travel as not to give the block enough momentum to leave the plate when it starts to travel in the negative direction. Since you know the period is 1.5s, the velocity of the plate is then a function of its amplitude or displacement. The only assumption to be made is that the plates position is sinusoidal and not stepped.

Hint: When the plate reaches its top peak, the block should experience an acceleration of 0.
 
Last edited:
still catch no ball... :(
 
Ok, find a ball or box or some solid object. Put it in your open hand and start moving your hand up and down slowly. Then start moving it up and down faster until the ball in your hand starts to leave it when you move your hand from going up to going down. This the point you need to calculate by finding the distance you move your hand in a certain amount of time. You know the acceleration of gravity(9.81 m/s^2) and now you need to find the acceleration of the plate and ball. You will find when you start manipulating the equations that the mass of the ball cancels out.
 
man, i understand all of it...but getting the equations up is mind boggling. These are what i gotten.


velocity= 2A/1.5s

-kx=ma
-kx=m9.81

at the top peak which can be either -A or A
acceleation = kA=0

therefor A=k at the top peak.

anybody can give the equations to play around with?
 
Hi hemetite,

hemetite said:
man, i understand all of it...but getting the equations up is mind boggling. These are what i gotten.


velocity= 2A/1.5s

-kx=ma
-kx=m9.81

at the top peak which can be either -A or A
acceleation = kA=0

The acceleration is not zero at the amplitude.

In this case you're looking for the amplitude at which the block is just barely leaving the plate at the highest point. The reason it is leaving the plate is because the spring is pulling the plate down faster than the ball can keep up. So if the block has lost contact with the plate, what is its acceleration?

Once you have that, how is maximum acceleration related to amplitude?
 
okay... Acceleration of the plate cannot be more than 9.81ms or else the box will lose contact.

diSplacement is proportional to force. So at the peak.
F=m9.81

Displacement
m9.81=A cos(wt + teta)

Acceleation
9.81= -w2 A cos(wt + teta)

w=2pi/1.5

Correct so far?
 
hemetite said:
okay... Acceleration of the plate cannot be more than 9.81ms or else the box will lose contact.

That's right; so you want to find the amplitude that gives a maximum acceleration of 9.81 m/s.

diSplacement is proportional to force. So at the peak.
F=m9.81

Displacement
m9.81=A cos(wt + teta)

This does not look right; you have a force on the left and distance on the right.

Acceleation
9.81= -w2 A cos(wt + teta)

w=2pi/1.5

These last two are right and will give you the answer. What do you get for A?
 
Acceleration
9.81= -w2 A cos(wt + teta)

w=2pi/1.5

A=9.81/(-w2 A cos (wt + teta)

i thought of this...

what puzzle me...is how to calculate the

cos (wt + teta) part...was the value of t and teta?
 
  • #10
hemetite said:
Acceleration
9.81= -w2 A cos(wt + teta)

w=2pi/1.5

A=9.81/(-w2 A cos (wt + teta)

i thought of this...

what puzzle me...is how to calculate the

cos (wt + teta) part...was the value of t and teta?

You had already determined that 9.81 was the maximum acceleration. Think about what range of values the cosine function is able to have; what then is the cosine equal to? In other words, when the acceleration is a maximum, what is the value of the cosine function?
 
  • #11
Omg!...on my way home from school...it struck me and i solve it...hurray hurray...


Acceleration
9.81= -w2 A cos(wt + teta)

w=2pi/1.5

A=9.81/(-w2 cos (wt + teta)

at maximum amplitude the cos (0) which will give a value of 1.

that will give us

A=9.81/(-w2 (1) )

Hurray! hurray!...finally got it...

Thank you guys...
 
  • #12
hemetite said:
Omg!...on my way home from school...it struck me and i solve it...hurray hurray...


Acceleration
9.81= -w2 A cos(wt + teta)

w=2pi/1.5

A=9.81/(-w2 cos (wt + teta)

at maximum amplitude the cos (0) which will give a value of 1.

that will give us

A=9.81/(-w2 (1) )

Hurray! hurray!...finally got it...

Thank you guys...


That's right. To take care of the minus sign, you might want to think of using [itex]\cos(\pi)=-1[/itex], which will give the same magnitude of the amplitude.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K