SHO Eigenvalues with Non-Standard Potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the eigenvalue problem for a quantum harmonic oscillator (SHO) with a modified potential, specifically V=a(mω²x²)/2, where 'a' is a constant. Participants explore how this alteration affects the Hamiltonian and the corresponding energy eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the original Hamiltonian and the modified one, questioning how to incorporate the constant 'a' into the potential. There is mention of using creation and annihilation operators and a substitution involving angular frequency.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the substitution of angular frequency and the resulting energy eigenvalues. Some participants express uncertainty about the validity of the substitution and its mathematical implications.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the assumptions regarding the potential and the nature of the constant 'a'. Participants are considering the implications of changing the angular frequency on the energy eigenvalues without reaching a definitive conclusion.

indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
We know the eigenvalue relation for the Hamiltonian of a SHO (in QM) though relating the raising and lowering operators we get:

[tex]H= \hbar \omega (N+1/2)[/tex]

This is true for [tex]H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{m \omega^2 x^2}{2}[/tex]

I would like to solve for another case where [tex]V=a\frac{m \omega^2 x^2}{2}[/tex]

where a is some constant

We now have [tex]H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{ a m \omega^2 x^2}{2}[/tex]

I'm not sure how to go about this. When relating the creation and annihilation operators, we get: [tex]a^{\dagger} a = \frac{m \omega}{2 \hbar} x^2 + \frac{1}{2m \omega \hbar} p^2 -\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

I'm not sure how to incorporate a constant into the potential, any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is equivalent to the substitution w'=sqrt(a)w, or am I missing something?
 
how can you arbitrarily say that though?
 
indigojoker said:
how can you arbitrarily say that though?

It's mathematically true that you can make that substitution. Maybe I'm missing some subtlety here!
 
so you're saying that the energy eigenvalues will be:
[tex]H= \hbar \sqrt{a}\omega (N+1/2)[/tex]
 
a is just a constant, now if you look at the harmonic potential, the [tex]\omega[/tex] is the "ground"(classical) angular frequency of the potential. So if you draw the potential as a function of x, i.e V(x) you see that the energy eigenvalues are [tex]\hbar (\omega \sqrt a)(n + 1/2)[/tex]. because you simple do the change of variable that christianjb pointed out, so you get new annihilation operators and so on. Introducing this a, just implies that we change to the same 1-dim SHO but with another angular frequency.
 
indigojoker said:
so you're saying that the energy eigenvalues will be:
[tex]H= \hbar \sqrt{a}\omega (N+1/2)[/tex]

Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K