Is the Voltage the Only Factor in Electrical Shocks from Automotive Batteries?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the safety of touching automotive batteries, particularly in scenarios involving wet hands or conductive materials. Participants explore the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance in the context of electrical shocks, drawing comparisons to lower voltage sources like 9V batteries.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that dry hands have high resistance, making it safe to touch a car battery, while wet hands significantly lower resistance, increasing the risk of shock.
  • One participant argues that the voltage of a car battery is not high enough to pose a real threat, even with wet hands, citing the example of a 9V battery causing only a mild sensation.
  • Another participant counters that the current capability of a car battery is much higher than that of a 9V battery, which could lead to dangerous situations if a low resistance path is established.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for burns when using a car battery, especially if a low resistance path is created through wet skin or conductive materials.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of current paths, noting that the effects of electrical current can vary significantly depending on the route it takes through the body.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the role of energy stored in the battery and its relevance to the danger posed by electrical shocks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the safety of touching car batteries, particularly with wet hands. There is no consensus on whether the voltage alone is the determining factor for safety, as some emphasize the importance of current and resistance.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference varying skin resistances under different conditions, such as wetness, and the implications for electrical shock risk. The discussion includes assumptions about the effects of voltage and current that remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in electrical safety, automotive maintenance, or the principles of electricity may find this discussion relevant.

Jacobim
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
It is said that with dry hands, you can touch the poles of a car battery and it will not shock you. I understand this is because dry hands have a very high resistance.

Now if you have wet hands, or even worse if you have needles stuck into your skin that are attached to the battery posts, this should reduce the resistance and could shock you.

Someone told me that the second scenario (wet hands, or needles in fingers) would not be dangerous. They cited the example of putting a small 9V on your tongue. In this case you only feel a slightly uncomfortable buzz on your tongue. Therefore, because a car battery has only slightly higher voltage, it would be only a slightly worse than this and not deadly.

Does the fact that the car battery has so much more capacity than the small 9V not affect this situation? If you connected an automotive battery across your tongue the same way as the small 9V, would it be only slightly worse of a shock?

If this is true, then I can see how the important factor is just voltage and not the amount of energy available.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Current capability is irrelevant to your question. You could put a the terminal of a 1000 amp, but 3 volt, electric welder on you tongue and not feel a thing. It's the voltage that matters, assuming at least a small current capability so 1000 volts with the capability of delivering something like 80 milliamps will kill you but a 50,000 volt Van De Graff generator will just make your hair stand on end.
 
phinds said:
Current capability is irrelevant to your question

only partly

in a PP9 9V battery, the 9V potential can only a small amount of available current
A 12V car battery can supply 100's of Amps ... across a low resistance connection ... spanner handle. wet conductive skin or its sub layers
significant current can flowthe 9V battery across dry skin ... nothing ... it cannot overcome the high resistance, across the wet tongue good current flow as can be strongly felt
I would consider it stupid and dangerous to try that with a 12V car battery ... its likely to result in significant burns

Dave
 
Ok thanks. One thing I found confusing is in circuits class, there would be circuit examples with a constant current source instead of a constant voltage source. So that had me confused about what is the driving force in a circuit.
 
davenn said:
only partly

in a PP9 9V battery, the 9V potential can only a small amount of available current
A 12V car battery can supply 100's of Amps ... across a low resistance connection ... spanner handle. wet conductive skin or its sub layers
significant current can flowthe 9V battery across dry skin ... nothing ... it cannot overcome the high resistance, across the wet tongue good current flow as can be strongly felt
I would consider it stupid and dangerous to try that with a 12V car battery ... its likely to result in significant burns

Dave

What about the danger of wet hands on a car battery? That was my original question to the person I am discussing it with. Wikipedia suggests wet skin could reduce resistance to 1000 ohms. That gives 12 mA across whatever path the current takes, and that seems dangerous to me. He maintains that in general, a car battery has too low of a voltage to pose any real threat to a person even with wet hands (I am referring strictly electrical danger, not danger from shorting the terminals with something metal and getting burned), and that the energy stored is irrelevant.
 
Jacobim said:
He maintains that in general, a car battery has too low of a voltage to pose any real threat to a person even with wet hands

That is possible ... I am not willing to try. you need enough voltage to overcome the skin resistance
from just a surface of the skin point of view its not an issue for once outside that wet area you are back to normal
skin resistance between the hands. IF the moisture has had time to penetrate the skin layers on each hand and provides a low resistance path
to the inner flesh etc then you will be at a point where there is a low resistance path between the hands and its possible that you will receive a shock and possibly burns

Jacobim said:
and that the energy stored is irrelevant.

its not irrelevant once the skin resistance breakdown voltage has been reached
and reducing the resistance, reduces the breakdown voltage value

Dave
 
Car batteries are completely safe to touch. Your body has too high of an internal resistance to cause any dangerous current.
Only at higher voltages does it get dangerous.
 
Jacobim said:
Ok thanks. One thing I found confusing is in circuits class, there would be circuit examples with a constant current source instead of a constant voltage source. So that had me confused about what is the driving force in a circuit.

Real physical constant current sources work by varying their voltage to maintain a constant current. For example, if I connect a 1 amp current source across a potentiometer dialed to ten ohms, the source will adjust its output voltage to ten volts and one amp will flow. Turn the potentiometer down to 5 ohms, and the source will notice that the current is increasing and adjust its voltage down - it will stabilize at five volts and one amp pretty quickly.
 
Nugatory said:
Real physical constant current sources work by varying their voltage to maintain a constant current. For example, if I connect a 1 amp current source across a potentiometer dialed to ten ohms, the source will adjust its output voltage to ten volts and one amp will flow. Turn the potentiometer down to 5 ohms, and the source will notice that the current is increasing and adjust its voltage down - it will stabilize at five volts and one amp pretty quickly.

Ah, ok. All that information was hidden behind a little circle symbol that said "5 amps" (or maybe I didn't read my textbook thoroughly).
 
  • #10
Jacobim said:
Someone told me that the second scenario (wet hands, or needles in fingers) would not be dangerous. They cited the example of putting a small 9V on your tongue. In this case you only feel a slightly uncomfortable buzz on your tongue. Therefore, because a car battery has only slightly higher voltage, it would be only a slightly worse than this and not deadly.
The current path also matters. Passing current from one side of your tongue to the other is unpleasant but harmless, while passing the same amount of current through your heart is dangerous. It is good practice when working around electrical wiring to keep your left hand behind your back so there`s no chance of passing current arm-to-arm (and through the heart).
 
  • #11
marcusl said:
It is good practice when working around electrical wiring to keep your left hand behind your back so there`s no chance of passing current arm-to-arm (and through the heart).
That's going to be a good trick. I usually find I need one MORE arm, not one less, when dealing with wiring/connectors.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K