Shock wave through a liquid metal filled steel tube

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transmission of shock waves through a liquid metal (mercury) filled steel tube (A36 steel). Participants explore the conditions under which a shock wave could exert pressures that may exceed the yield strength of the tube, considering factors such as material properties, wave propagation speeds, and pressure dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a shock wave can transmit through the mercury without interacting with the tube wall, suggesting that the shock wave could be visualized as a disk of high pressure mercury exerting force on the tube wall.
  • Another participant outlines a sequence of events assuming a short-duration pressure pulse, indicating that if the pressure pulse is strong enough, it could yield the tube wall, but the outcome depends on the duration of the pressure pulse and the wall's inertial effects.
  • A different participant raises concerns about the existence of a "shock wave," noting the differing speeds of sound in iron and mercury, and suggesting that energy may couple across the impedance mismatch, potentially affecting the pressure dynamics in both materials.
  • One participant introduces the concept of water hammer as a related phenomenon, implying a connection to the transmission of pressure waves in liquids.
  • Another participant clarifies that water hammer is a transmission line effect and emphasizes the compressibility of gases in relation to shock wave dynamics, contrasting it with the behavior of liquids.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of shock waves in this context, with some proposing that shock waves can exist and interact with the tube wall, while others question the conditions under which this occurs. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific dynamics and outcomes of shock wave transmission in the described scenario.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions, such as the effects of elasticity, inertial mass, and the speed of sound in different materials, which may influence the behavior of the shock wave and the resulting stresses on the tube wall. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

BrandonBerchtold
Messages
46
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Would an A36 steel tube be able to axially transmit a shock wave with a peak pressure higher than the yield strength of the steel tube?
Would an A36 steel tube filled with liquid mercury be able to transmit a shock wave longitudinally through the liquid mercury with a peak pressure higher than the yield strength of the steel tube? My thinking is that since the shock wave is traveling normal to the tube wall, it should not be interacting with the tube wall. However, if the shock wave is pictured to be a disk of high pressure mercury, this disk should be exerting a force, equal to the peak shock pressure, outwards into the tube wall (granted this disk would be traveling at the speed of sound in mercury and not have long to exert said force on the walls).
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If we assume a short duration pressure pulse normal to the tube wall, then the sequence of events is as follows:
1) The pressure pulse applies force to the tube wall. The force is large enough to yield the wall.
2) The tube wall has elasticity and inertial mass, so it starts to accelerate outward.
3) As the tube wall moves outward, the material stress increases.
4) If the pressure pulse ends before the tube wall yields, then the tube wall does not yield. This ignores tube wall inertia, but that effect should be small.
5) I am assuming that the shock wave exerts pressure equally in all directions.

So, yes it is possible for the pressure to be large enough to yield the tube wall, without yielding the tube wall. But it may or may not be possible to create a pressure pulse short enough for that to happen.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChemAir, berkeman and BrandonBerchtold
Will there actually be a “shock wave” ?

The speed of sound is 5,130 m/s in iron, but only 1,450 m/s in mercury. The pressure step that starts in the mercury will gradually enter the iron and race ahead of the pulse that remains in the mercury. Some of that energy will reenter the mercury well ahead of the pulse and so rapidly reduce the slope of the pressure step in the mercury.

The pulse in the mercury will be traveling along the steel wall, so some energy will couple across the impedance mismatch into the steel. I expect the low speed in mercury will form a greater amplitude step than it will in the iron. That may attenuate the stress that appears in the iron.

Pressure in a cylindrical tube causes a hoop stress that is twice the longitudinal stress, which explains why pipes split longitudinally. Will the same be true for a slow pressure step inside the tube?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BrandonBerchtold
How about something like water hammer?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BrandonBerchtold
Water hammer is a transmission line effect. The liquid is not compressible.

A shock wave pressure step compresses and heats a gas, which increases the speed of sound behind the step, so it accelerates the velocity of the shock front and keeps the step sharp.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K