Shortcut to find if a matrix (nxn) is singular or not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlevanchuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
To determine if an nxn matrix is singular, calculating the determinant is a common method, as a determinant of zero indicates singularity. For smaller matrices like 2x2, the formula Δ (ad-bc) can be used, but this becomes impractical for larger matrices. Eigenvalue analysis is another approach; if any eigenvalue is zero, the matrix is singular. While manual calculations can be tedious, computational tools like Wolfram Alpha can efficiently handle determinant calculations for larger matrices. Ultimately, while shortcuts exist, they often still require some level of computation.
dlevanchuk
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Is there a quick shortcut to find if a matrix (nxn) is singular or not?

For example, if the matrix is (2x2), and \Delta (i.e. ad-bc) = 0, then matrx is singular and irrevertable..

Is there something similar for (nxn), like (3x3) and (100, 100), without doing the linear independence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There are different ways to see if a matrix is singular or not, but all of them requires some calculation, as far as I know.
 


then what would be the fastest way to check the singularity of matrix?

lets say my (3x3) matrix is A = [1 2 3; 1 3 2; 1 1 4]. Obviously, if we set Ax = 0, and do G/J elimination we find that this particular matrix is singular... but, man! It takes forever haha.
 


Try to find its eigenvalues - if one of them is 0, then A is singular.
 


dlevanchuk said:
Is there a quick shortcut to find if a matrix (nxn) is singular or not?

For example, if the matrix is (2x2), and \Delta (i.e. ad-bc) = 0, then matrx is singular and irrevertable..

Is there something similar for (nxn), like (3x3) and (100, 100), without doing the linear independence?

Yes, it's called the determinant, but it's not practical to do by hand for big matrices. Luckily there are computers...

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=det{{1%2C+2%2C+3}%2C+{1%2C+3%2C+2}%2C+{1%2C+1%2C+4}}
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K