Shortest Distance in Euclidean Geometry: Proven or Definition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shortest distance
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 2K views
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
In euclidean geometry I believe the shortest distance is the perpendicular one. Can this be proven or is it a definition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on your definition of a line. If it's a function with a constant slope, it can be proven with calculus of variations, I think. I don't think in Euclidian Geometry a line's rigorously defined.

EDIT: Never mind, I though you were asking if it could be proven that the shortest distance between two points is a line. See scurty's answer for a better reply
 
Last edited:
aaaa202 said:
In euclidean geometry I believe the shortest distance is the perpendicular one. Can this be proven or is it a definition?

Not enough clarification here. Do you mean the shortest distance from a point not on a line to the line itself? I imagine it can be solved by considering the perpendicular line and another line emanating from the point. You will have a right triangle and the other line not perpendicular is the hypotenuse of the triangle, so therefore longer.
 
The length of the hypotenuse, c, of a right triangle, with legs a and b, satisfies [itex]c^2= a^2+ b^2[/itex] and so the hypotenuse is loner than either leg. Do you see why that means that the perpendicular line (one of the legs) is shorte than any othe line? (Ahh- that's essentially what scurty said.)