Shortest Distance in Euclidean Geometry: Proven or Definition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shortest distance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the shortest distance in Euclidean geometry, specifically whether this is a proven fact or merely a definition. Participants explore the nature of lines and distances in this geometric context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the definition of a line in Euclidean geometry and its implications for proving the shortest distance. Others suggest considering the relationship between perpendicular lines and the distances involved in right triangles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have offered insights into the geometric relationships at play, particularly regarding right triangles and the properties of hypotenuses versus legs.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the specific scenario being discussed, particularly whether the focus is on the distance from a point to a line or between two points. This ambiguity may influence the direction of the discussion.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
In euclidean geometry I believe the shortest distance is the perpendicular one. Can this be proven or is it a definition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on your definition of a line. If it's a function with a constant slope, it can be proven with calculus of variations, I think. I don't think in Euclidian Geometry a line's rigorously defined.

EDIT: Never mind, I though you were asking if it could be proven that the shortest distance between two points is a line. See scurty's answer for a better reply
 
Last edited:
aaaa202 said:
In euclidean geometry I believe the shortest distance is the perpendicular one. Can this be proven or is it a definition?

Not enough clarification here. Do you mean the shortest distance from a point not on a line to the line itself? I imagine it can be solved by considering the perpendicular line and another line emanating from the point. You will have a right triangle and the other line not perpendicular is the hypotenuse of the triangle, so therefore longer.
 
The length of the hypotenuse, c, of a right triangle, with legs a and b, satisfies [itex]c^2= a^2+ b^2[/itex] and so the hypotenuse is loner than either leg. Do you see why that means that the perpendicular line (one of the legs) is shorte than any othe line? (Ahh- that's essentially what scurty said.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
82
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K