Shortest Distance in Euclidean Geometry: Proven or Definition?

In summary, in Euclidean geometry, the shortest distance is the perpendicular one. However, whether this can be proven or is simply a definition depends on the definition of a line. If a line is defined as a function with a constant slope, it can be proven using calculus of variations. In Euclidean geometry, a line's definition is not rigorously defined. Therefore, it can be argued that the shortest distance between two points is a line, but it cannot be definitively proven.
  • #1
aaaa202
1,169
2
In euclidean geometry I believe the shortest distance is the perpendicular one. Can this be proven or is it a definition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Depends on your definition of a line. If it's a function with a constant slope, it can be proven with calculus of variations, I think. I don't think in Euclidian Geometry a line's rigorously defined.

EDIT: Never mind, I though you were asking if it could be proven that the shortest distance between two points is a line. See scurty's answer for a better reply
 
Last edited:
  • #3
aaaa202 said:
In euclidean geometry I believe the shortest distance is the perpendicular one. Can this be proven or is it a definition?

Not enough clarification here. Do you mean the shortest distance from a point not on a line to the line itself? I imagine it can be solved by considering the perpendicular line and another line emanating from the point. You will have a right triangle and the other line not perpendicular is the hypotenuse of the triangle, so therefore longer.
 
  • #4
The length of the hypotenuse, c, of a right triangle, with legs a and b, satisfies [itex]c^2= a^2+ b^2[/itex] and so the hypotenuse is loner than either leg. Do you see why that means that the perpendicular line (one of the legs) is shorte than any othe line? (Ahh- that's essentially what scurty said.)
 
Back
Top