1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Shortest possible damping time in Optical Molasses

  1. Apr 27, 2017 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A beam of $$^{39}K$$ atoms is slowed with a Zeeman slower with laser light tuned to the $$4s^2S_{1/2} --4p^2P_{3/2}$$ transition with $$F=2, m_F=2 -> F'=3,m_{F'}=3 (\lambda =767nm)$$ Nuclear spin $$I=3/2$$. The most probably velocity the atoms escape from the oven with is $$v_0 =450m/s$$ and the lifetime of the excited state is $$26nm$$.

    The first few parts of the question ask for the stopping distance, maximum possible scattering force, and the number of scattering events taking place in the time it takes for the atom to slow down.

    The bit I'm stuck on:

    After Zeeman slowing, atoms are now placed in an optical molasses. What is the shortest possible damping time in the absence of heat due to fluctuations if the laser intensity is $$I=0.75W/m^2?$$ (Note $$I/I_{sat} << 1).$$

    2. Relevant equations
    $$F_{scatt} = \frac{\hbar k\Gamma}{2} \frac{I/I_{Sat}}{1+ I/I_{Sat} +(\frac{2\delta}{\Gamma})^2}$$
    $$F_{molasses} = -2kv \frac{\partial F_{scat}}{\partial \omega}=-\alpha v$$

    $$\alpha = 4\hbar k^2 \frac{I}{I_{sat}} \frac{-2\delta/\Gamma}{(1+(2\delta/\Gamma)^2)^2}$$
    is the damping constant.

    the damping time is:
    $$\tau = \frac{M}{2\alpha}$$

    3. The attempt at a solution
    I've completed the first few parts of the question with relative ease. The issues I have are arising from calculating the damping coefficient. I also think that due to the values given in the question (which I haven't had to use most of yet) .

    There's a few things I have deduced from my lecture notes such as

    $$\delta = \omega -\omega_0 +kv = \frac{\mu}{\hbar} B(z)$$
    where ω is laser frequency, ω0 is atomic resonance, k is wavenumber, v is the doppler shift, and the magnetic field B is there to counteract the doppler shift to stay on resonance.
    $$B(z)= B_{bias} + B_0(1-\frac{z}{L_0})^{1/2}$$ where
    $$ B_{bias} = \frac{\hbar}{\mu}(\omega -\omega_0)$$
    which I think can be taken as 0 since it's on resonance so ω = ω0? And with the 1-z/L0, does z=L0 since the molasses comes after we've already Zeeman slowed? But with these assumptions I think this makes the B field zero and so all the preamble of the question is unnecessary so something's probably wrong.

    I also need to calculate the initial magnetic field $$B_0 = v_0 \hbar k/\mu$$ where $$\mu=(g_F'm_F' - g_Fm_F)\mu_B$$ can be calculated hyperfine lande factor.

    I think all of this takes care of the detuning δ in the equation of the damping coefficient but I'm not sure if I'm barking up the wrong tree entirely.

    I also have that $$\tau = \frac{1}{\Gamma}$$ where tau is the lifetime of the state and is given, so this takes care of the gamma in the equation.

    I'm now confused as the how I find the saturation intensity? I think this is the only value unknown now (if my assumptions are correct). I haven't calculated anything yet because my knowledge isn't there yet so I fear it would be a waste of time.

    Thanks in advance for any help!
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 29, 2017 #2
    This article helped me with gaining a somewhat practical feel for what these variables actually represent in real life (albeit "lab life" haha).

    Usually if there are gaps in what you've been given vs what you need for your calcs, assumptions can be based on the properties/ nature /definition of the "stuff" mentioned in a problem statement, e.i. optical molasses and potassium. Other assumptions could also be preferences of your lecturer or the text book for a course, or simply an "industry habit" :-) It doesn't hurt to ask ourselves "what would I have done if I had been the first person on earth to work this out?" :-)

    For example they write...
    α describes the viscosity imparted by the light force to the atom, reflecting the restoring force applied when the atom is not at zero velocity. This configuration is known as an optical molasses, because of this restoring force, which makes the light behave like a thick, viscous medium for the atoms in it.


    Cooling at high intensities
    Let us consider an example, of laser cooling at high laser intensities. Keep in mind that laser cooling works because F=−αv and α>0. Assume we have a detuning of about one linewith, δ=−Γ. Now plot the friction coefficient α as a function of intensity:

    Initially, at small intensities, α increases as a function of intensity. Don't be confused by the fact that the Doppler limit is achieved at low intensities. The diffusion coefficient is also linear in intensity at low intensity. α increases with I/I0 at first, and peaks around 0.5, but above the saturation limit α actually changes sign and starts heating. When α<0 then, counter-intuitively, blue detuned light can be used to cool atoms.

    I'm not sure if your question specified one-dimentional or three-dimentional optical molasses but it covers both.

    I also found the graphs and tables in these two papers quite helpful. They are specific to potassium.

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Apr 29, 2017
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Threads for Shortest possible damping
Damped oscillation and time between displacement maximums