Should Equation (30) be Revised to '2πfn=2nc'π/L'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vaatmoly
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a potential correction to the equation "2πfn=2nπ/L," questioning whether it should include the propagation velocity, suggesting "2πfn=2nc'π/L" instead. Key points include the clarification that fn represents a temporal frequency, while n is the mode number and L is the transmission line length. The context involves photon modes in a one-dimensional transmission line, which has two modes propagating in opposite directions. The importance of including the propagation velocity (c') in the equation is emphasized to ensure dimensional consistency, confirming that the original equation cannot be correct without it. The derivation of Johnson noise, which is referenced, is noted to be extensive and requires consulting the original text for full understanding.
vaatmoly
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Just above equation (30), it says "2πfn=2nπ/L". Should it be "2πfn=2nc'π/L" instead?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vaatmoly said:
Just above equation (30), it says "2πfn=2nπ/L". Should it be "2πfn=2nc'π/L" instead?
Is fn a spatial or a temporal frequency?
What is n and L?
Maybe you could make pdf of the section, so one can see the context.
 
You have to get the book and read it. It's part of the derivation of Johnson noise. The derivation is several pages long.
 
vaatmoly said:
You have to get the book and read it. It's part of the derivation of Johnson noise. The derivation is several pages long.
Maybe you could just define the quantities in the equation?
 
Yes, sure.
We are considering photon modes in a transmission line(an electromagnetic system in one dimension). The transmission line has 2 photon modes(one propagating in each direction) of frequency "2πfn=2nπ/L" where L is the transmission line length, c' is the propagation velocity on the line, n is the mode number
 
vaatmoly said:
Yes, sure.
We are considering photon modes in a transmission line(an electromagnetic system in one dimension). The transmission line has 2 photon modes(one propagating in each direction) of frequency "2πfn=2nπ/L" where L is the transmission line length, c' is the propagation velocity on the line, n is the mode number
Then it's pretty clear. The frequency has dimension 1/time so you need the c in the equation to get the dimensions right.
The 2nd equation could be right, the 1st can't be.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top