Should I read Introduction to Calculus and Analysis by Courant?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the suitability of "Introduction to Calculus and Analysis" by Courant for someone with a calculus background looking to study multivariable and single variable calculus rigorously. Participants explore various book options and their appropriateness for different learning goals.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about which book to choose among several options, including Courant, Spivak, and Apostol, for rigorous study of calculus.
  • Another participant suggests that opinions on the best book vary significantly and that the choice may depend on the individual's goals for their mathematical studies.
  • A participant warns against choosing "mathematical methods for physicists" books, noting that they typically lack rigor in the mathematical sense.
  • One participant argues that there are good exercises in the "mathematical methods for physicists" books, suggesting that they can still be beneficial.
  • A suggestion is made to find Blank's solution manual for the first volume of Courant and Fritz, indicating that it may aid in understanding the material.
  • It is noted that the second volume of Courant and Fritz contains answers in the back of the book, which may be helpful for learners.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of various textbooks, indicating that there is no consensus on the best choice for rigorous study. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which book is most suitable.

Paul_dirac
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Should i read Introduction to Calculus and Analysis by Courant?
I have calculus background I want to study multivariable and single variable in rigorous way
There is a lot of books in this subject like Spivak, apstoal,Courant,... . I am not sure what to choose
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: S.G. Janssens
Physics news on Phys.org
Come on Paul, you of all people don't need that kind of thing. :wink:

Seriously speaking: Nice, welcome to mathematical analysis. There was a topic on this recently that you may find useful. The forum search finds more such topics, as well as reviews of books. Opinions on what is (are) the best book(s) vary quite a bit, and the answer probably also depends on your own goals. (What do you want to do with your newly acquired knowledge?)

In general, whatever you choose, I would not opt for one of the "mathematical methods for physicists" books. They may be fine for what they aim to do, but usually rigor (in the mathematical sense) is not really part of that aim.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul_dirac
Why not, there are some good exercises in it.

My suggestion find Blank's solution manual to these books, you can find a scanned copy of it in the internet, of course.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul_dirac
My suggestion of Blank's book is only valid for the first volume of Courant and Fritz.
The second volume has answers in the back of the book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K