Courses Should I Retake Physics 1 Before Taking Physics 2 After Learning Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter C5F8576
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics education
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a student who completed algebra-based Physics 1 and has taken Calculus 2 and Linear Algebra can proceed directly to calculus-based Physics 2. The consensus is that the student should enroll in calculus-based Physics 1 first, as it provides a necessary foundation for upper-level physics courses. This is particularly important for a physics major aiming for a strong GPA and understanding of concepts, as calculus is integral to solving physics problems. Concerns are raised about potential school policies regarding course prerequisites and credit for overlapping courses, suggesting that auditing calculus-based Physics 1 might be a viable alternative if direct enrollment is not permitted.
C5F8576
Hi,

I took algebra-based Physics 1 (classical mechanics). I have taken up to Calc 2 and Linear Algebra, and I was wondering if it's ok to move on to calc-based Physics 2 (electromagnetism) or if I should take calc-based Physics 1.

I intend to major in physics and received an A- in Physics 1. My GPA is important to me as is having a strong foundation for upper level courses. Please advise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
C5F8576 said:
I took algebra-based Physics 1 (classical mechanics). I have taken up to Calc 2 and Linear Algebra, and I was wondering if it's ok to move on to calc-based Physics 2 (electromagnetism) or if I should take calc-based Physics 1.
The correct alternative is enter the course for Calculus-based Physics 1.
 
Calc based physics 1. The calculus approach is how physicists actually solve the problems so you need it for a proper foundation.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes symbolipoint and topsquark
C5F8576 said:
Hi,

I took algebra-based Physics 1 (classical mechanics). I have taken up to Calc 2 and Linear Algebra, and I was wondering if it's ok to move on to calc-based Physics 2 (electromagnetism) or if I should take calc-based Physics 1.

I intend to major in physics and received an A- in Physics 1. My GPA is important to me as is having a strong foundation for upper level courses. Please advise.
Definitely calculus-based Physics 1. It is de rigeur as a strong foundation for upper level physics courses; and, since you've already been exposed to basic physics principles in algebra-based Physics 1 and have already completed Calculus 2, you should be well positioned to do better with respect to grades as well; hence, satisfying both of your goals.

But please clarify your situation. Are you a transfer student who took algebra-based Physics I at a different school (such as community college)? But if not, and you take both algebra-based Physics I and calculus-based Physics I at the same school, can you get credit for both? Did you decide on becoming a physics major only after taking algebra-based Physics I (otherwise, why didn't you take the calculus-based Physics I at the start)?
 
I don't think you really have a choice here. Passing calculus-based Physics I is normally a pre-requisite for calculus-based Physics II. I doubt the school will let you enroll in Physics II.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and gwnorth
I agree - you probably don't have a choice.
You also may run into the problem that your school will not let you take both courses for credit. In that case, I would recommend auditing Calc-based Physics 1 before taking Physics 2, (If that option is available)
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
I am currently in the second (and final) year of my MS in Physics. I've just started my research, which focuses on identifying Dark Matter through Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) extensions. My supervisor has directed me to learn model building using FeynRules and subsequent calculations via MadGraph or other simulators. I've successfully built models for QED and QCD, and I am now working on Weak Interactions, Electroweak theory, and symmetry breaking. My immediate goal for the next few...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Back
Top