Are these two optics courses too similar to justify taking?

  • Context: Courses 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vancouver_water
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Courses Optics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on two optics courses: one from the electrical engineering department focusing on planar dielectric waveguides, optical fibers, and semiconductor lasers, utilizing the textbook “Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications” by A. Yariv and P. Yeh, 6th Ed, 2007. The second course, from the physics department, covers principles of optical physics including interference, diffraction, and Gaussian beams, using "Classical and Modern Optics" by Dan Steck. The courses may have overlapping content, but the physics course is likely more theoretical and includes a lab component, making it more applied. Consulting course instructors for guidance on overlap is recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical waveguides and fiber optics
  • Familiarity with interference and diffraction principles
  • Knowledge of semiconductor lasers and optical detectors
  • Basic concepts of Maxwell's equations and wave propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Consult with course instructors for detailed course comparisons
  • Research the differences between theoretical and applied optics courses
  • Explore quantum optics and integrated photonics topics
  • Review the lab components of optics courses for practical experience
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering or physics, particularly those interested in optics, wave propagation, and applied physics, will benefit from this discussion.

vancouver_water
Messages
76
Reaction score
10
There are two courses at my school involving optics. I'm not sure if they are too similar that taking both would be a waste of time, or if they would be different enough that it would be ok to take both.

The first one is from the electrical engineering department, here is the course description:
Planar dielectric waveguides; single mode optical fibers; integrated optics waveguides and devices; semiconductor lasers; optical detectors; optical communications links.
It uses this textbook: “Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications”, by A. Yariv and P. Yeh, 6th Ed, 2007.

The other course is from the physics department:
Principles and applications of optical physics. Interference, diffraction, coherence, polarization, Fresnel relations, optical coatings, waves in dielectric media, Gaussian beams, waveguides, optical cavities, lasers, fibre optics, and Fourier optics.

with the textbook Classical and Modern Optics by Dan Steck.

If they are too similar I might replace one with a graduate statistical mechanics course. If not, I would take both.

What do you think? Keeping in mind I will for sure take this EM course:
Applications of Maxwell's theory. Wave propagation in dielectrics, conductors and plasmas, wave guides, radiation, antennae, and special relativity.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you ask the course instructors to compare for you the two courses and give you some guidance. I am sure they are aware of each other and they are best qualified to know how much their courses overlap. At some institutions, course descriptions offered by two different department and are substantially similar carry the statement "Credit not offered for both EE XXX and PHYS YYY." I would also suspect that the physics course is more likely to be more theoretical and less "hands on" than the EE course, especially if it is taught by a theoretical physicist.
 
I emailed the course instructor for the physics one. He was unaware that the EE one even existed. The Physics one is taught by an experimentalist and has a lab portion as well, so I think it would be a more applied course. I am interested in quantum optics and integrated photonics if that is any help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K