Should Insulting Emojis be Discouraged in Communication Guidelines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarvis323
  • Start date Start date
  • #61
caz said:
I‘m game. Name one and I’ll find the insulting interpretation.
No, I just say it's debatable. I see the generality and not specific examples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
caz said:
I cannot imagine what an effective set of emoji civility guidelines would look like.

To me this seems like a better argument for having them than against having them.
 
  • #63
Jarvis323 said:
To me this seems like a better argument for having them than against having them.
Formulate a draft policy for PF then. I think you will find that drafting a speech policy that does not also inhibit speech that you would like to encourage is harder than it sounds. The policy needs to be easy to understand, simple to enforce and preserve/refute the advantages I raised in points 7 and 8 in post 56.
 
Last edited:
  • #64
caz said:
Formulate a draft policy for PF then. I think you will find that drafting a speech policy that does not also inhibit speech that you would like to encourage is harder than it sounds. The policy needs to be easy to understand, simple to enforce and address my points 7 and 8 in post 56.
I don't agree with your opinion in (8). First, not using emojis to hurl thinly veiled insults doesn't mean you have to do it with words instead. You can just try to be nice to people and constructive instead. And personally I think thinly veiled insults are not better than direct ones. And because using emojis for food fights and thinly veiled insults isn't discouraged, I think it actually might more often lead threads down a negative spiral as people get frustrated, angry, resentful, and less communicative.
 
  • Sad
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and BillTre
  • #65
caz said:
Formulate a draft policy for PF then
"Do NOT feed the trolls...EVER!"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and malawi_glenn
  • #66
Jarvis323 said:
I don't agree with your opinion in (8). First, not using emojis to hurl thinly veiled insults doesn't mean you have to do it with words instead. You can just try to be nice to people and constructive instead. And personally I think thinly veiled insults are not better than direct ones. And because using emojis for food fights and thinly veiled insults isn't discouraged, I think it actually might more often lead threads down a negative spiral as people get frustrated, angry, resentful, and less communicative.
Let’s try this another way. There are a lot of negative emoji’s in this thread. Do you find any of them insulting?
 
  • #67
Jarvis323 said:
I don't agree with your opinion in (8). First, not using emojis to hurl thinly veiled insults doesn't mean you have to do it with words instead. You can just try to be nice to people and constructive instead. And personally I think thinly veiled insults are not better than direct ones. And because using emojis for food fights and thinly veiled insults isn't discouraged, I think it actually might more often lead threads down a negative spiral as people get frustrated, angry, resentful, and less communicative.
In order to move forward, I will temporarily grant that you have refuted 8. Please proceed with your plan.
 
  • #68
I think this issue has been beaten to death. Thanks for the feedback everyone.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: gmax137, Wrichik Basu, Jodo and 7 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
503K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K