Should It Be In Series or Parallel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Procrastinate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the connection of car lights with different voltage ratings to a 12 V accumulator. The original poster questions whether the lights should be connected in series or parallel, considering the voltage ratings of the lights.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of connecting lights in series versus parallel, questioning the effects on voltage ratings and the potential for lights to burn out. Some mention Kirchhoff's laws and the voltage divider rule in their reasoning.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the connection methods, with some participants asserting that the lights should be in series while others express concerns about the voltage ratings. The discussion includes clarifications about terminology, such as the use of the term "accumulator" for batteries.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the differing terminology used in various regions, particularly the term "accumulator" for batteries, which may not be familiar to all. There is also a mention of the potential confusion regarding voltage ratings and their implications for light connections.

Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
The accumulator of a car produces 12 V. If the car lights at the sides and rear are
each rated for 12 V, but the two interior lights are only rated at 6 V, how should
the lights be connected — in series or in parallel?



The answer is series but I said parallel. However, if you put them in series wouldn't the lights break because they are only rated at 6V?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Procrastinate said:
The accumulator of a car produces 12 V. If the car lights at the sides and rear are
each rated for 12 V, but the two interior lights are only rated at 6 V, how should
the lights be connected — in series or in parallel?



The answer is series but I said parallel. However, if you put them in series wouldn't the lights break because they are only rated at 6V?

If you connect them in parallel, then each light will get a pd of 12V, so then they would burn out or what have you.

But if you have them in series, the 12V would be split into 6V for one light and 6V for the other light. So by Kirchoff's 2nd law, the sum of the emfs (12V battery) is equal to the sum of the pds (6V light & 6V light)
 
Wow, that's different. Where is a battery called an accumulator?
 
They should be in series. A quick check would be the voltage divider rule:

V(out) = V(in)*[ R1 / (R1 + R2) ]
 
Phrak said:
Wow, that's different. Where is a battery called an accumulator?

I didn't know what an accumulator was, so I wiki'd it...and well this is what it said

wikipedia said:
An accumulator is an apparatus by means of which energy can be stored, such as a rechargeable battery or a hydraulic accumulator. Such devices may be electrical, fluidic or mechanical and are sometimes used to convert a small continuous power source into a short surge of energy or vice versa. Other examples of accumulators include capacitors, compulsators, steam accumulator, wave energy machines, pumped-storage hydroelectric plants.

In general usage in an electrical context the word accumulator would normally mean a lead-acid battery.
 
rock.freak667 said:
I didn't know what an accumulator was, so I wiki'd it...and well this is what it said

Yeah. Apparenty the Brits use it.
 
Im a brit, and an electrical engineer at that and to be honest its not a word i come across too often maybe deep down in an old textbook.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
928
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K