Should the Reactions Count Include Quotes of a Post?

  • Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date
  • #1
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,854
4,808
Reactions (as I understand the counting is done) is the sum of various options available from the "Like" button.
I think that using a quote from a post should also count as a reaction, since it is, in fact, a reaction to the post, and would not happen without it.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander and berkeman

Answers and Replies

  • #2
berkeman
Mentor
60,411
10,713
Interesting idea. In one sense it's analogous to the number of "citations" of a paper, but OTOH, a quote here at PF could be to say "good point" or to say "that's nutz!" :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #3
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,854
4,808
A "that's nutz" text comment seems entirely equivalent, to me, to the Like button reaction choice of "skeptical", which is counted as a reaction and is similar in meaning to "that's nutz".
 
  • Informative
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK and berkeman
  • #4
berkeman
Mentor
60,411
10,713
Hmm, I did not know that. So a "like" reaction counts the same as a "skeptical" reaction? Yikes!
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #5
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,854
4,808
Its like for politicians:
Bad reactions are not bad if they are reactions (since all media mentions are good (usually)).
 
  • Skeptical
Likes berkeman
  • #6
hutchphd
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,509
2,680
There is no bad publicity! It is the backbone of civilization as we know it..
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes berkeman and BillTre
  • #7
berkeman
Mentor
60,411
10,713
Just trying to pump up the reaction scores for you guys...
 
  • Haha
Likes BillTre
  • #8
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,854
4,808
I was thinking. just loving the skeptical choice all of a sudden.
 
  • #9
hutchphd
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
3,509
2,680
I occasionally say stupid things but perhaps I should try harder!!
More seriously I would point out that direct citation is often accompanied by a reaction skeptical or otherwise. I enjoy being skeptical when I'm not really sure....
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #10
berkeman
Mentor
60,411
10,713
I occasionally say stupid things but perhaps I should try harder!!
No, no, no. You're doing fine... :oldeyes:
 
  • Haha
Likes phinds and hutchphd
  • #11
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
9,765
6,859
1626739189244.png

As I understand it, a member's like count or "reaction count" includes only the first 4, but not the last 2. Number 5 (wow) I don't know.

It would make sense if the last 2 disapproval added -1 to the count, but I think they count as zero.

@Greg Bernhardt can give us the authoritative answer.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #12
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,854
4,808
View attachment 286232
As I understand it, a member's like count or "reaction count" includes only the first 4, but not the last 2. Number 5 (wow) I don't know.

It would make sense if the last 2 disapproval added -1 to the count, but I think they count as zero.

@Greg Bernhardt can give us the authoritative answer.

If you go to the reactions received part under your "MY PF" you will see them all listed equally as reactions, and the numbers of each category for you.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes anorlunda and Bystander
  • #13
berkeman
Mentor
60,411
10,713
If you go to the reactions received part under your "MY PF" you will see them all listed equally as reactions, and the numbers of each category for you.
Woo-hoo! So that's where all of my Reactions were coming from. Hah, and I was sweating all of those sad/skeptical comments.
 
  • #14
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Insights Author
9,765
6,859
If you go to the reactions received part under your "MY PF" you will see them all listed equally as reactions, and the numbers of each category for you.
Thanks, I didn't know about that.
 
  • #15
35,630
12,171
If you go to the reactions received part under your "MY PF" you will see them all listed equally as reactions, and the numbers of each category for you.
The sum that's shown in posts and the profile only covers the positive ones, however. There is a slight discrepancy, probably from deleted posts or similar, but I checked how the counter changes when you give these different reactions.
"Wow", "sad" and "skeptical" don't count.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Wow
Likes dextercioby, phinds, PeroK and 1 other person
  • #16
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2020 Award
1,854
4,808
"Wow" does count?
That doesn't make sense.
I consider "Wow" to be positive.
 
  • Wow
Likes Vanadium 50 and PeroK
  • #17
symbolipoint
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Gold Member
6,389
1,281
Reactions (as I understand the counting is done) is the sum of various options available from the "Like" button.
I think that using a quote from a post should also count as a reaction, since it is, in fact, a reaction to the post, and would not happen without it.
(1)
Member could choose to make a quote and say what he wants to say in a new post, about the post, along with choosing one of the reaction icons.

(2)
The available Reaction icons is limited; maybe a few more can be put into the forum.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
  • #18
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,193
9,875
A "that's nutz" text comment seems entirely equivalent, to me, to the Like button reaction choice of "skeptical", which is counted as a reaction and is similar in meaning to "that's nutz".
You had a reaction score of 4505 before I reacted sceptically to this claim. You still have 4505.

Which is good going for a mere 1800+ posts!
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog and BillTre
  • #19
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,193
9,875
"Wow" does count?
That doesn't make sense.
I consider "Wow" to be positive.
Still 4505, despite my wow!
 
  • Like
Likes pbuk and sysprog
  • #20
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,193
9,875
I think that using a quote from a post should also count as a reaction, since it is, in fact, a reaction to the post, and would not happen without it.
To give a serious answer. On the homework threads, the OP's posts are almost always replied to with the next comment, hint, correction. To take an example:

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ing-beam-in-two-different-directions.1005257/

What would be the point of counting all that toing and froing over a homework problem?
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby, sysprog and BillTre
  • #21
35,630
12,171
You had a reaction score of 4505 before I reacted sceptically to this claim. You still have 4505.

Which is good going for a mere 1800+ posts!
Posts in the lounge (including general discussion) don't increase the counter, but likes there do.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
  • #22
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,193
9,875
Posts in the lounge (including general discussion) don't increase the counter, but likes there do.
I have noticed that anomaly too.
 
  • #25
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,193
9,875
I used to have over 10,000 posts but as some point Greg changed the way the count is done.
I was going to use the sad icon, but that wouldn't have added to your like count; and I thought losing all those posts was bad enough!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes dextercioby, Ivan Seeking, BillTre and 1 other person

Related Threads on Should the Reactions Count Include Quotes of a Post?

Replies
3
Views
764
Replies
4
Views
837
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
805
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Top