Should the Units of a Constant Match the Integral Boundary Conditions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of matching units for constants in integrals, specifically when integrating the function 0.8um1.8um A eB/E(x) dx, where A has units of 1/cm. Participants emphasize that while it is not mandatory to convert units, maintaining consistent units is crucial for accurate calculations. The function E(x) = x + x² + x³ must also be defined with appropriate units to avoid dimensional inconsistencies. Ultimately, the consensus is that unit tracking is essential for obtaining meaningful results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus and definite integrals
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis and unit conversion
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties
  • Experience with numerical integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study dimensional analysis in physics to understand unit consistency
  • Learn about numerical integration methods using tools like Python's SciPy library
  • Explore the implications of unit conversions in mathematical modeling
  • Investigate the use of symbolic computation software, such as Mathematica, for handling units in integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers who are involved in numerical integration and require a solid understanding of unit consistency in mathematical expressions.

Another
Messages
104
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Integrate an exponential function with a constant (1/cm) from 0.8 um to 1.8 um.
Relevant Equations
int A exp(-(B/(x+x^2+x^3)))
I want to integrate this function

## \int_{0.8um}^{1.8um} A e^{B/E(x)} \, dx ##

But A has a unit as ## 1/cm ##. Should I change ##1/cm## to ##1/um## by multiplying ##1/10^{4}##

For this function, I decided to integrate using the online numerical integral, This side .

I am just curious that the unit of the constants must be the same as boundary condition for integration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another said:
Homework Statement: Integrate an exponential function with a constant (1/cm) from 0.8 um to 1.8 um.
Relevant Equations: int A exp(-(B/(x+x^2+x^3)))

I want to integrate this function

## \int_{0.8um}^{1.8um} A e^{B/E(x)} \, dx ##

But A has a unit as ## 1/cm ##. Should I change ##1/cm## to ##1/um## by multiplying ##1/10^{4}##

For this function, I decided to integrate using the online numerical integral, This side .

I am just curious that the unit of the constants must be the same as boundary condition for integration.
The integral can only have one value. And that must coincide with the calculation where the units match.
 
PeroK said:
The integral can only have one value. And that must coincide with the calculation where the units match.
So, Do I have to change the unit of a constant to be the same?
Thankyou very much.
 
Another said:
Homework Statement: Integrate an exponential function with a constant (1/cm) from 0.8 um to 1.8 um.
Relevant Equations: int A exp(-(B/(x+x^2+x^3)))

I want to integrate this function

## \int_{0.8um}^{1.8um} A e^{B/E(x)} \, dx ##
If the function ##E(x)## is ##E(x) = x + x^2 + x^3##, you need to fix that first. You clearly can't add quantities with different dimensions and units, i.e., ##\rm{m, m^2, and\ m^3}##.

Another said:
But A has a unit as ## 1/cm ##. Should I change ##1/cm## to ##1/um## by multiplying ##1/10^{4}##
You don't technically have to change it, but at the very least you have to keep track of the units as you should always do.

On the one hand, you could have an answer that has units of ##\rm \mu m/cm## but most likely you're expected to give a unitless answer. It's kind of like answering the question "if you're traveling 5 m/s, what distance will you travel in 1 min?" by saying "5 m min/s" whereas the expected and useful answer is "300 m". On the other hand, I can imagine scenarios where the units ##\rm \mu m/cm## might make more sense semantically.
 
vela said:
If the function ##E(x)## is ##E(x) = x + x^2 + x^3##, you need to fix that first. You clearly can't add quantities with different dimensions and units, i.e., ##\rm{m, m^2, and\ m^3}##.
In ##E(x) = x + x^2 + x^3## we are not told the unit for ##x##; this is missing critical information.

For illustration, suppose that ##E(x)## is potential energy in joules as a function of distance ##x## is metres. Then:
##E(x) = x + x^2 + x^3##
is valid and is in effect shorthand for
##E(x) = Ax + Bx^2 + Cx^3##
where the 3 constants are ##A = 1J/m, B = 1J/m^2 ## and ##C = 1J/m^3##.
The constants and their units are 'hidden' because the numerical value of each constant happens to be 1.

If we wish to change so that ##x## is in cm, the modified equation would simply be:
##E(x) = \frac x{100} + (\frac x{100})^2 + (\frac x{100})^3##

Ideally the units should be indicated in the function definition, e.g.
##E(x/m) = x + x^2 + x^3## and
##E(x/cm) = \frac x{100} + (\frac x{100})^2 + (\frac x{100})^3##
 
vela said:
If the function ##E(x)## is ##E(x) = x + x^2 + x^3##, you need to fix that first. You clearly can't add quantities with different dimensions and units, i.e., ##\rm{m, m^2, and\ m^3}##.You don't technically have to change it, but at the very least you have to keep track of the units as you should always do.

On the one hand, you could have an answer that has units of ##\rm \mu m/cm## but most likely you're expected to give a unitless answer. It's kind of like answering the question "if you're traveling 5 m/s, what distance will you travel in 1 min?" by saying "5 m min/s" whereas the expected and useful answer is "300 m". On the other hand, I can imagine scenarios where the units ##\rm \mu m/cm## might make more sense semantically.
Thank you for answering, I know that there are coefficients on the front of the polynomials but I just typed the very simple form of the equation by ignoring these coefficients (make it very easy to read and I'd like to focus on A and the unit of it) . Finally, the completely correct form of this equation will be calculated in the program by myself, and the unit of E(x) will be canceled by the unit of B.

Thank you very much for the wonderful advice.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K