Jason Ko
- 21
- 6
For the horizontal case of SHM, we only need to consider KE and EPE. But should we also take GPE into consideration when we are dealing with a vertical case?
The discussion revolves around whether gravitational potential energy (GPE) should be considered in the context of simple harmonic motion (SHM) when the system is oriented vertically, as opposed to horizontally where only kinetic energy (KE) and elastic potential energy (EPE) are typically considered.
Participants express differing views on the necessity of considering GPE in vertical SHM, with no consensus reached on the matter.
The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of SHM and the effects of gravity, as well as the mathematical treatment of the equations involved. Some participants reference external resources for further clarification.
Not necessarily. The equilibrium length of a spring will increase if a mass is hanging vertically. But, the period of oscillation is unaffected. It depends only on the mass and the spring constant.Jason Ko said:For the horizontal case of SHM, we only need to consider KE and EPE. But should we also take GPE into consideration when we are dealing with a vertical case?
Thks a lotPeroK said:Not necessarily. The equilibrium length of a spring will increase if a mass is hanging vertically. But, the period of oscillation is unaffected. It depends only on the mass and the spring constant.
If you do the maths, you'll see where the GPE cancels out.
Or, simply Google for SHM mass spring system. There's a good explanation on phys.libretexts.org.