Jason Ko
- 21
- 6
For the horizontal case of SHM, we only need to consider KE and EPE. But should we also take GPE into consideration when we are dealing with a vertical case?
The discussion confirms that gravitational potential energy (GPE) should not be considered in the vertical case of simple harmonic motion (SHM) when analyzing a mass-spring system. While the equilibrium length of the spring increases due to the vertical hanging mass, the period of oscillation remains unaffected, depending solely on the mass and the spring constant. The mathematical analysis shows that GPE cancels out in the equations of motion, leading to a harmonic oscillator behavior around the new equilibrium position.
PREREQUISITESPhysics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of oscillatory systems will benefit from this discussion.
Not necessarily. The equilibrium length of a spring will increase if a mass is hanging vertically. But, the period of oscillation is unaffected. It depends only on the mass and the spring constant.Jason Ko said:For the horizontal case of SHM, we only need to consider KE and EPE. But should we also take GPE into consideration when we are dealing with a vertical case?
Thks a lotPeroK said:Not necessarily. The equilibrium length of a spring will increase if a mass is hanging vertically. But, the period of oscillation is unaffected. It depends only on the mass and the spring constant.
If you do the maths, you'll see where the GPE cancels out.
Or, simply Google for SHM mass spring system. There's a good explanation on phys.libretexts.org.