Show exp(A) is invertible for a matrix A

  • Thread starter Thread starter chipotleaway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the invertibility of the matrix exponential defined as e^A = I_n + A + (1/2!)A^2 + (1/3!)A^3 + ... + (1/2012!)A^2012, where A is an n x n matrix satisfying A^{2013} = 0. It is established that e^A is invertible by demonstrating that the function e^x has an inverse for real numbers, and this concept extends to matrices. The suggested approach involves using the binomial theorem to show that e^{sA}e^{tA} = e^{(s+t)A}, ultimately leading to the expression for (e^A)^{-1} in terms of A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Matrix exponentiation and properties of e^A
  • Understanding of nilpotent matrices, specifically A^{2013} = 0
  • Binomial theorem and its application in matrix algebra
  • Induction proofs in the context of matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix exponentials, particularly for nilpotent matrices
  • Learn about the binomial theorem's application in linear algebra
  • Explore induction techniques for proving properties of matrices
  • Investigate the relationship between matrix functions and their inverses
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced matrix theory and its applications in proving properties of matrix exponentials.

chipotleaway
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Define e^A=I_n+A+\frac{1}{2!}A^2+\frac{1}{3!}A^3+...+\frac{1}{2012!}A2012
where A is an nxn matrix such that A^{2013}=0. Show that e^A is invertible and find an expression for (e^A)^{-1} in terms of A.

The Attempt at a Solution



To first show that it's invertible, can I just show the function e^x has an inverse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chipotleaway said:

Homework Statement



Define e^A=I_n+A+\frac{1}{2!}A^2+\frac{1}{3!}A^3+...+\frac{1}{2012!}A2012
where A is an nxn matrix such that A^{2013}=0. Show that e^A is invertible and find an expression for (e^A)^{-1} in terms of A.

The Attempt at a Solution



To first show that it's invertible, can I just show the function e^x has an inverse?

Where x is a real number? That would work fine if A were diagonal. I don't think assuming ##A^{2013}=0## makes it any easier. I would just try to show ##e^{sA}e^{tA}=e^{(s+t)A}## first. It's really just the binomial theorem. Then put s=1 and t=(-1).
 
Do you know that x^n- 1= (x- 1)(1+ x+ x^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ x^{n-1})?

If not try proving it by induction on n. Notice that proof works for matrices as well as numbers.
 
Try it first for a matrix B with B^4 = 0 (to make the problem smaller): if you can do it with one where you can see all the terms in the sum and see what happens, writing down the work for your case will just require a little careful writing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K