MHB Show Finite Principal Ideals Contain $(d)$ in U.F.D.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In a unique factorization domain (U.F.D.), any non-zero element \( d \) can be expressed as a product of irreducible elements, which are also prime. To show that there are finitely many different principal ideals containing the ideal \( (d) \), it is established that a principal ideal generated by an element \( i \) must divide \( d \). The divisors of \( d \) take the form \( a_1^{j_1}\cdots a_r^{j_r} \) with constraints on the exponents \( j_i \) based on the factorization of \( d \). Since there are finitely many choices for each \( j_i \), the set of divisors of \( d \) is finite, confirming that there are finitely many principal ideals containing \( (d) \). Thus, the discussion concludes with the affirmation of the finiteness of these ideals.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a U.F.D. and $0\neq d\in R$.
I want to show that there are finitely many different principal ideals that contain the ideal $(d)$.

A principal ideal is generated by a single element, say $i$, and so that it contains the ideal $(d)$, $i$ must divide $d$, right? (Wondering)
We have that $d=a_1^{k_1}\cdots a_r^{k_r}$ with $a_i$ irreducible.
Since $R$ is a U.F.D. the irreducible elements are prime. Does it follow from that that the divisors of $d$ are of the form $a_1^{j_1}\cdots a_r^{j_r}$ with $0\leq j_i\leq k_i$ ? (Wondering)
From that we get that the set of the divisors is finite, right? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
Deveno said:
Yes.

Nice... Thank you! (Yes)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K