Show something is a vector space.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that certain operations satisfy the vector space axioms, specifically the distributivity and associativity laws. The user attempts to demonstrate the first distributive law using rational numbers and vectors in R^n, stating that (r+s)v = rv + sv. They also seek clarification on the associativity law, mistakenly applying the multiplication operation instead of addition. The correct approach involves showing that [a(+)b](+)c = a(+)[b(+)c].

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their axioms
  • Familiarity with operations in R^n
  • Knowledge of rational numbers and their properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces, focusing on the axioms of addition and scalar multiplication
  • Learn how to prove vector space properties using examples from R^n
  • Explore the concept of functions from R^n to R^n and their implications in vector spaces
  • Practice problems involving the verification of vector space axioms
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, mathematicians interested in vector space theory, and educators teaching vector space concepts.

hopsonuk
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

[PLAIN]http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/9001/150674.png

2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution

I think, I need to write: a(x)[b(+)c]

Then prove:

Distributivity law 1: Unsure of
Distributivity law 2: Proving: a(x)[b(+)c] = [a(x)b](+)[a(x)c]
Associativity law: Proving: a(x)[b(+)c] = [a(x)b](+)c
Identity: Unsure of

Is this along the correct lines?[/CODE][/CODE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hopsonuk said:
1. Homework Statement

[PLAIN]http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/9001/150674.png

2. Homework Equations



3. The Attempt at a Solution

I think, I need to write: a(x)[b(+)c]

Then prove:

Distributivity law 1: Unsure of
Distributivity law 2: Proving: a(x)[b(+)c] = [a(x)b](+)[a(x)c]
Associativity law: Proving: a(x)[b(+)c] = [a(x)b](+)c
Identity: Unsure of

Is this along the correct lines?[/CODE][/CODE]

Imageshack is changing some of their policies. Can you move to another host like Photobucket or something along the line? To tell the truth, I cannot see your image. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll show you how to prove the first distributive law, and then you can take it from there.

Let r,s be in Q and let v= (b_1,...,b_n) be in R^{n}. Then, you need to show that (r+s)v = rv (x) sv.

So, (r+s)v = (r+s)(b_1,...,b_n) = (b_1^{r+s},...,b_n^{r+s})=(b_1^{r},...,b_n^{r}) (x) (b_1^{s},...,b_n^{s}) = rv (x) sv as desired.

Now, just do similar things for each of the axioms.
 
VietDao29 said:
Imageshack is changing some of their policies. Can you move to another host like Photobucket or something along the line? To tell the truth, I cannot see your image. :(

Ok :) - Here is a re-upload:

Wtc.png
 
VietDao29 said:
Imageshack is changing some of their policies. Can you move to another host like Photobucket or something along the line? To tell the truth, I cannot see your image. :(

Is what I have written for distributivity law 2 correct?
 
hopsonuk said:
Is what I have written for distributivity law 2 correct?

Yes.
 
I think my associativity is incorrect.
 
If i write this for associativity: b(x)[c(x)a] = (b x c)(x)a

I cannot get the RHS = LHS..
 
hopsonuk said:
If i write this for associativity: b(x)[c(x)a] = (b x c)(x)a

I cannot get the RHS = LHS..

Hold on a second. Where does the (x) take place? It is defined as a function from RXR^n to R^n. a,b,c are all elements of R^n. You need to check associativity for (+), not (X), that is:
[a(+)b](+)c = a(+)[b(+)c]
 
  • #10
Ok, so how do I write this out to check LHS = RHS ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K