Show that a transformation is canonical

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The transformation defined by Q=\ln \left ( \frac{\sin p }{q} \right ) and P=q \cot p is shown to be canonical by verifying the necessary conditions involving Poisson brackets. The conditions include [Q,P]_{q,p}=1, [Q,Q]_{q,p}=0, and [P,P]_{q,p}=0. Initial calculations revealed errors in the partial derivatives, but after corrections, the transformation satisfies the canonical criteria. The Hamiltonian H' is not explicitly defined but is essential for further analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical transformations in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Poisson brackets and their properties
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their application in physics
  • Basic concepts of Hamiltonian dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of Poisson brackets in detail
  • Learn about Hamiltonian mechanics and canonical transformations
  • Explore examples of canonical transformations in classical mechanics
  • Investigate the role of Hamiltonians in phase space analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, Hamiltonian dynamics, and mathematical methods in physics.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


Show that the following transformation is canonical:
[itex]Q=\ln \left ( \frac{\sin p }{q} \right )[/itex], [itex]P=q \cot p[/itex].


Homework Equations


A transformation is canonical if [itex]\dot Q=\frac{\partial H'}{\partial P}[/itex] and [itex]\dot P =-\frac{\partial H'}{\partial Q}[/itex].
H' is the Hamiltonian in function of Q and P.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've calculated [itex]\dot Q = \dot p \cot p - \frac{\dot q \sin p }{q}[/itex] and [itex]\dot P=\dot q \cot p - \frac{q \dot p}{\sin ^2 p}[/itex].
Now I guess I must check out if the conditions about the partial derivatives of the Hamiltonian are satisfied but I do not know either H(q,p) nor do I know H'(Q,P). I'm stuck here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok guys, discard my attempt in my last post.
I've found in some class notes and in Landau&Lifgarbagez's book the necessary condition for a transformation to be canonical. If I'm not wrong, I must show that
I)[itex][Q,P]_{q,p}=1[/itex]
II)[itex][Q,Q]_{q,p}=0[/itex]
III)[itex][P,P]_{q,p}=0[/itex].
Where [itex][f,g]_{p,q}[/itex] denotes the Poisson brackets of f and g with respect to p and q. In other words, this is worth [itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial p} \frac{\partial g}{\partial q}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial q} \frac{\partial g}{\partial p}[/itex].
Now I have that [itex]Q=\ln \left ( \frac{\sin p }{q} \right )[/itex] and [itex]P=q \cot p[/itex].
I tried to be careful in doing the partial derivatives. I found out that:
(1)[itex]\frac{\partial Q}{\partial p}=q \cot p[/itex]
(2)[itex]\frac{\partial P}{\partial q}= \cot p[/itex]
(3)[itex]\frac{\partial Q}{\partial q}=-\frac{1}{q}[/itex]
(4)[itex]\frac{\partial P}{\partial p}=q(-1- \cot ^2 p)[/itex]

Using this, I found out I) to be worth [itex](1-q) \cot ^2 p-1[/itex]. Unfortunately this isn't worth 1. What am I doing wrong?

Edit: I just found a mistake in my definition of Poisson's brackets. But now I find I) to be worth [itex]1+ \cot ^2 p-q \cot ^2 p[/itex] which is still wrong. I've rechecked the partial derivatives, I do not see any mistake, yet my result keeps being wrong.

Edit 2: This can be rewritten as [itex]\frac{1}{\sin ^2 p}-q \cot ^2 p[/itex]. This is not worth 1 so that the transformation isn't canonical, which is absurd. I do not see any mistake.

Edit 3 : I am nut guys! I found out the mistake in a derivative. I now reach all the results I should, problem solved!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
56
Views
5K