Show that f is uniformly continuous

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a function \( f \) is uniformly continuous on a set \( A \) under the condition that if \( x_n', x_n'' \in A \) and \( x_n' - x_n'' \to 0 \), then \( f(x_n') - f(x_n'') \to 0 \). The participants establish that assuming \( f \) is not uniformly continuous leads to a contradiction by applying the definition of uniform continuity and selecting \( \delta = \frac{1}{n} \). This choice allows the construction of sequences that converge to zero, ultimately contradicting the assumption of non-uniform continuity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of uniform continuity in mathematical analysis
  • Familiarity with limits and sequences in calculus
  • Knowledge of quantifiers in mathematical logic
  • Basic proficiency in constructing mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of uniform continuity in detail
  • Learn about the properties of limits and convergence of sequences
  • Explore examples of uniformly continuous functions and their characteristics
  • Investigate common proof techniques in real analysis, particularly proof by contradiction
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in real analysis, particularly those studying continuity and limits in calculus.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! :cool:

I want to show that if $x_n',x_n'' \in A$ with $x_n'-x_n'' \to 0 \Rightarrow f(x_n'')-f(x_n'') \to 0$,then $f$ is uniformly continuous on $A$.

We suppose that $f$ is not uniformly continuous o $A$.
So, $ \exists \epsilon>0$ such that $\forall \delta>0$ and $ \forall y_n',y_n'' \in A$ with $|y_n'-y_n''|<\delta$ $\Rightarrow$ $|f(y_n')-f(y_n'')| \geq \epsilon$.
Is it right so far? And how can I continue? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! :cool:

I want to show that if $x_n',x_n'' \in A$ with $x_n'-x_n'' \to 0 \Rightarrow f(x_n'')-f(x_n'') \to 0$,then $f$ is uniformly continuous on $A$.

We suppose that $f$ is not uniformly continuous o $A$.
So, $ \exists \epsilon>0$ such that $\forall \delta>0$ and $ \forall y_n',y_n'' \in A$ with $|y_n'-y_n''|<\delta$ $\Rightarrow$ $|f(y_n')-f(y_n'')| \geq \epsilon$.
Is it right so far? And how can I continue? (Thinking)
When negating a statement containing quantifiers, each $\exists$ must be changed to $\forall$ and vice versa. The definition of uniform continuity states that $$ \forall \varepsilon>0\ \exists \delta>0\text{ such that } \forall x,x'\in A \text{ with } |x-x'|<\delta,\ |f(x) - f(x')| < \varepsilon.$$ The negation of that is that if $f$ is not uniformly continuous on $A$ then $$ \exists \varepsilon>0 \text{ such that }\forall \delta>0\ \exists x,x'\in A \text{ with } |x'-x''|<\delta,\ \text{ but }|f(x') - f(x'')| \geqslant \varepsilon.$$ Apply that statement with $\delta = 1/n$ ($n = 1,2,3,\ldots$). That will give you two sequences $x'_n$ and $x''_n$ that contradict the given property of $f$.
 
Opalg said:
When negating a statement containing quantifiers, each $\exists$ must be changed to $\forall$ and vice versa. The definition of uniform continuity states that $$ \forall \varepsilon>0\ \exists \delta>0\text{ such that } \forall x,x'\in A \text{ with } |x-x'|<\delta,\ |f(x) - f(x')| < \varepsilon.$$ The negation of that is that if $f$ is not uniformly continuous on $A$ then $$ \exists \varepsilon>0 \text{ such that }\forall \delta>0\ \exists x,x'\in A \text{ with } |x'-x''|<\delta,\ \text{ but }|f(x') - f(x'')| \geqslant \varepsilon.$$ Apply that statement with $\delta = 1/n$ ($n = 1,2,3,\ldots$). That will give you two sequences $x'_n$ and $x''_n$ that contradict the given property of $f$.

Why do we take $\delta=\frac{1}{n}$ ? Because of the fact that $\frac{1}{n} \to 0$ ? (Wondering)
 
evinda said:
Why do we take $\delta=\frac{1}{n}$ ? Because of the fact that $\frac{1}{n} \to 0$ ? (Wondering)
Yes. It is a convenient way to get two sequences $(x'_n)$ and $(x''_n)$ such that $x'_n-x''_n\to0.$
 
Opalg said:
Yes. It is a convenient way to get two sequences $(x'_n)$ and $(x''_n)$ such that $x'_n-x''_n\to0.$
So,we suppose that $f$ is not uniformly continuous on $A$.So,
$ \exists \varepsilon>0 \text{ such that }\forall \delta>0\ \exists y_n,y_n'\in A \text{ with } |y_n-y_n'|<\delta,\ \text{ but }|f(y_n) - f(y_n')| \geqslant \varepsilon.$

We pick $\delta=\frac{1}{n} \to 0$,and because of the fact that $y_n,y_n'\in A$ and $ |y_n-y_n'|<\delta \to 0$,we conclude that $f(y_n)-f(y_n') \to 0$,that is a contradiction,as $|f(y_n) - f(y_n')| \geqslant \varepsilon.$Right?? (Thinking)
 
evinda said:
So,we suppose that $f$ is not uniformly continuous on $A$.So,
$ \exists \varepsilon>0 \text{ such that }\forall \delta>0\ \exists y_n,y_n'\in A \text{ with } |y_n-y_n'|<\delta,\ \text{ but }|f(y_n) - f(y_n')| \geqslant \varepsilon.$

We pick $\delta=\frac{1}{n} \to 0$,and because of the fact that $y_n,y_n'\in A$ and $ |y_n-y_n'|<\delta \to 0$,we conclude that $f(y_n)-f(y_n') \to 0$,that is a contradiction,as $|f(y_n) - f(y_n')| \geqslant \varepsilon.$Right?? (Thinking)

Or shouldn't I have used sequences? (Thinking)
 
Last edited:
Or is it better like that? (Thinking)

We suppose that $f$ is not uniformly continuous on $A$.So,
$ \exists \varepsilon>0 \text{ such that }\forall \delta>0\ \exists y,y'\in A \text{ with } |y-y'|<\delta,\ \text{ but }|f(y) - f(y')| \geqslant \varepsilon. $

We take $\delta_n=\frac{1}{n}$ and then $\forall y_n,y_n' \in A$ and $|y_n-y_n'|<\delta \Rightarrow y_n-y_n' \to 0$, we conclude that $f(y_n)-f(y_n') \to 0 $,that is a contradiction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K