Show that φ(v)=λv for a vector v and a coefficient λ

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating that for a linear map $\phi: V \rightarrow V$ on a $\mathbb{K}$-vector space $V$ with $\dim_{\mathbb{R}} V = n$, there exists a non-zero vector $v \in V$ and a scalar $\lambda \in \mathbb{K}$ such that $\phi(v) = \lambda v$. This is established under the condition that there exists a basis $B$ such that the matrix representation $M_B(\phi)$ is upper triangular, and that there are strictly increasing $\phi$-invariant subspaces $U_1 \subset U_2 \subset \ldots \subset U_n$. The argument confirms that $U_1$ must be one-dimensional, allowing for the selection of a non-zero vector $v$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear maps and vector spaces.
  • Familiarity with upper triangular matrices in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of $\phi$-invariant subspaces.
  • Concept of dimensionality in vector spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of upper triangular matrices in linear transformations.
  • Learn about $\phi$-invariant subspaces and their significance in linear algebra.
  • Explore the concept of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in relation to linear maps.
  • Investigate the Jordan form of matrices and its applications in linear transformations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone studying the properties of linear transformations and vector spaces will benefit from this discussion.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! 😊

Let $\mathbb{K}$ be a field, $1\leq n\in \mathbb{N}$ and let $V$ be a $\mathbb{K}$-vector space with $\dim_{\mathbb{R}}V=n$. Let $\phi :V\rightarrow V$ be a linear map.

The following two statements are equivalent:

- There is a basis $B$ of $V$ such that $M_B(\phi)$ is an upper triangular matrix.

- There are subspaces $U_1, \ldots , U_n\leq_{\mathbb{K}}V$ such that $U_i\subset U_{i+1}$ and $U_i$ is $\phi$-invariant.

Let $\phi$ satisfy the above properties. Then show that there is $0\neq v\in V$ and a $\lambda\in \mathbb{K}$ such that $\phi (v)=\lambda v$.

For that I have done the following:

We consider the subspace $U_1$. Since $U_1$ is $\phi$-invariant, it follows for $v\in U_1\subset V$ that $\phi (v)=\lambda v$, with $\lambda\in \mathbb{K}$.

Is that correct and complete? :unsure:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! 😊

Let $\mathbb{K}$ be a field, $1\leq n\in \mathbb{N}$ and let $V$ be a $\mathbb{K}$-vector space with $\dim_{\mathbb{R}}V=n$. Let $\phi :V\rightarrow V$ be a linear map.

The following two statements are equivalent:

- There is a basis $B$ of $V$ such that $M_B(\phi)$ is an upper triangular matrix.

- There are subspaces $U_1, \ldots , U_n\leq_{\mathbb{K}}V$ such that $U_i\subset U_{i+1}$ and $U_i$ is $\phi$-invariant.

Let $\phi$ satisfy the above properties. Then show that there is $0\neq v\in V$ and a $\lambda\in \mathbb{K}$ such that $\phi (v)=\lambda v$.

For that I have done the following:

We consider the subspace $U_1$. Since $U_1$ is $\phi$-invariant, it follows for $v\in U_1\subset V$ that $\phi (v)=\lambda v$, with $\lambda\in \mathbb{K}$.

Is that correct and complete? :unsure:
The two statements that you have mentioned are equivalent provided you assume that $U_1$ is not the trivial subsspace and the containments $U_i\subseteq U_{i+1}$ are strict.

With this, you, in your argument, need to mention $U_1$ is necessarily one dimensional (do you see why) and that $v$ can be chosen to be nonzero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K