Show that for the implicit midpoint rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shehpar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Implicit
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
shehpar
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
||e_i+1|| <= ||e_i||+h||f( (t_i+t_i+1)/2, y_i+y_i+1)/2)-f((t_i+t_i+1)/2, y(t_i+t_i+1)/2))||+O(h^3).

I need help about this question.if anybody able to guide me , I be thankful .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shehpar said:
||e_i+1|| <= ||e_i||+h||f( (t_i+t_i+1)/2, y_i+y_i+1)/2)-f((t_i+t_i+1)/2, y(t_i+t_i+1)/2))||+O(h^3).

I need help about this question.if anybody able to guide me , I be thankful .
You need to provide more information than this. There is a template with three parts:

  1. The complete problem statement
  2. Relevant or useful equations
  3. What you have tried

You have provided an equation with no explanation of what the symbols mean, or any other information, so don't expect much help.