Show that if A is invertible and diagonalizable,then A^−1 is

  • Thread starter Thread starter charlies1902
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
If matrix A is both invertible and diagonalizable, it can be expressed as A = PDP^(-1), where P contains the eigenvectors and D is the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues. For A to be invertible, all eigenvalues in D must be non-zero, ensuring D is also invertible. Consequently, the inverse A^(-1) can be represented as A^(-1) = P D^(-1) P^(-1), confirming that A^(-1) is diagonalizable. The discussion also highlights the need to find a 2x2 matrix that is diagonalizable but not invertible, emphasizing that such a matrix can have zero as an eigenvalue. The key takeaway is that the invertibility of A guarantees the invertibility of its diagonal matrix D.
charlies1902
Messages
162
Reaction score
0
Show that if A is invertible and diagonalizable,
then A^−1 is diagonalizable. Find a 2 ×2 matrix
that is not a diagonal matrix, is not invertible, but
is diagonalizable.


Alright, I am having some trouble with the first part.
So far, I have this:
If A is diagnolizable then
A=PDP^-1 where P is the matrix who's columns are eigenvectors and D is the diagonal matrix of eigevenvalues of A.


(A)^-1=(PDP^-1)^-1
A^-1=PDP^-1

How's that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


charlies1902 said:
Show that if A is invertible and diagonalizable,
then A^−1 is diagonalizable. Find a 2 ×2 matrix
that is not a diagonal matrix, is not invertible, but
is diagonalizable.Alright, I am having some trouble with the first part.
So far, I have this:
If A is diagnolizable then
A=PDP^-1 where P is the matrix who's columns are eigenvectors and D is the diagonal matrix of eigevenvalues of A.(A)^-1=(PDP^-1)^-1
A^-1=PDP^-1

How's that?

Just because D is diagonal doesn't mean D=D^(-1). And after you've fixed that, how do you know D is invertible?
 
Last edited:


Oh oops.
So
A^-1=P * D^-1 * P^-1

hmm, does D have to be invertible?
Can't you have eigen values of 0 and 2
so D looks like this:
0 0
0 2
which is not invertible?
 


charlies1902 said:
Oh oops.
So
A^-1=P * D^-1 * P^-1

hmm, does D have to be invertible?
Can't you have eigen values of 0 and 2
so D looks like this:
0 0
0 2
which is not invertible?

They told you A is invertible. Doesn't that mean D has to be invertible? Can you prove that?
 


Dick said:
They told you A is invertible. Doesn't that mean D has to be invertible? Can you prove that?

I'm confused on why you would have to prove that D is invertible and if it is always invertible.
I'm calling D the diagonal matrix who's diagonal elements are the eigenvalues of A.
 


charlies1902 said:
I'm confused on why you would have to prove that D is invertible and if it is always invertible.
I'm calling D the diagonal matrix who's diagonal elements are the eigenvalues of A.

D isn't invertible if it has a zero on the diagonal. But if it does then A has a zero eigenvalue and it's not invertible. I'm not sure whether you have to prove that or whether you can just say it. But it's not hard to prove.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K