Show that [J_a,G_a] = 0, commutation relationships

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the commutation relationship [J_a,G_a] = 0, utilizing the Jacobi identity and related equations. The subject area pertains to quantum mechanics and algebra involving angular momentum operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to expand the Jacobi identity and manipulate equations but expresses uncertainty about the next steps. Some participants suggest relating the commutators to the Jacobi identity in a different manner. Others question the lack of information regarding [G_a,G_b] and how that complicates the use of the Jacobi identity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to relate the given equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the Levi-Civita symbol to express G_a in terms of the commutators of J operators, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of certain commutation relationships, which may affect the problem-solving process. There is also mention of specific values for labels a, b, and c in the Jacobi identity that could be relevant to the solution.

ma18
Messages
93
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Using the given equations prove that

upload_2015-10-28_12-22-32.png

Homework Equations

upload_2015-10-28_12-22-47.png
,

upload_2015-10-28_12-23-42.png
,[/B]

upload_2015-10-28_12-21-41.png
+
upload_2015-10-28_12-21-50.png


(it won't render together in Maple for whatever reason)

The Attempt at a Solution



So I started with expanding the Jacobi Identity (the third relevant equation) and through tedious algebra arrived at proving it unnecessarily and then finding that

upload_2015-10-28_12-27-32.png


then by applying the second equation this goes to

upload_2015-10-28_12-27-49.png


I am unsure how to proceed from here however.

The question also gives the hint that the trick to solve it is to take the appropriate particular values of the labels a,b,y in the Jacobi identity but I am unsure how to use this.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not actually given ##[G_a,G_b]##, so it's a bit of a hassle to use that Jacobi identity. Try to find a way to relate ##[J_a,G_b]## to the expression ## [ J_a, [J_b,J_c]]## and use the Jacobi identity for that.
 
fzero said:
You're not actually given ##[G_a,G_b]##, so it's a bit of a hassle to use that Jacobi identity. Try to find a way to relate ##[J_a,G_b]## to the expression ## [ J_a, [J_b,J_c]]## and use the Jacobi identity for that.

Hmm okay, tbh I'm not sure how to proceed with that
 
ma18 said:
Hmm okay, tbh I'm not sure how to proceed with that

To push you along, consider
$$ {\epsilon_a}^{bc} [J_b,J_c] = i {\epsilon_a}^{bc} {\epsilon^d}_{bc} G_d.$$
Using an identity for the Levi-Civita symbol will give you an expression for ##G_a## in terms of the commutator of ##J##s.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
40K