Show that the Change in Volume is Independent of the Path

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating that the change in volume of an ideal gas is independent of the path taken, utilizing the ideal gas law, PV=nRT. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the derivatives of volume with respect to pressure and temperature, specifically through the equations ∂V/∂T and ∂V/∂P. The integration process is highlighted as formal, with a focus on maintaining consistent units, particularly when using the gas constant R in non-SI units. The final expression derived illustrates the relationship between changes in temperature and pressure and their effect on volume.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law (PV=nRT)
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Awareness of unit conversions, especially between SI and non-SI units
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the ideal gas law in different thermodynamic processes
  • Learn about partial derivatives and their significance in thermodynamic equations
  • Explore integration techniques specific to thermodynamic equations
  • Review unit conversion practices for gas constants in various measurement systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics and gas laws, will benefit from this discussion.

McAfee
Messages
96
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Gk7AcX6.png



Homework Equations


Svm7c35.png



The Attempt at a Solution


P22KBe3.png


I understand what the question is asking. Both ways I should get the same answer. I'm having trouble figuring out the mathematics behind this question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.
You're dealing with an ideal gas: what's the equation of state? (the one relating P, V and T)
 
Goddar said:
Hi.
You're dealing with an ideal gas: what's the equation of state? (the one relating P, V and T)

The equation of state would be PV=nRT.
P- pressure
V- volume
n- number of moles
T-temperature
R-universal constant
 
That was your only missing piece, now you can work the integrals.
 
Goddar said:
That was your only missing piece, now you can work the integrals.

So would I have to change the equation of state around and plug it into each change of V, change of T, and change of P?

Edit: I should plug them into the partial difference equation? The change in should be constants I think.

Edit(again): The only equation I really have to plug in is V=(RT)/P. I think I'm just taking different differentials followed by integration.
 
Last edited:
Use the equation of state to determine the derivatives. Example:
PV = nRT
so that, if n is constant:
VΔP + PΔV = nRΔT
When P is constant: \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} = \frac{nR}{P},
When T is constant: \frac{\partial V}{\partial P} = – \frac{nRT}{P^{2}}

Just pay attention to what's constant and what's not when following your equations. Take the time to understand what you're doing, but you have everything you need.
 
Goddar said:
Use the equation of state to determine the derivatives. Example:
PV = nRT
so that, if n is constant:
VΔP + PΔV = nRΔT
When P is constant: \frac{\partial V}{\partial T} = \frac{nR}{P},
When T is constant: \frac{\partial V}{\partial P} = – \frac{nRT}{P^{2}}

Just pay attention to what's constant and what's not when following your equations. Take the time to understand what you're doing, but you have everything you need.

Here is the work I have done so far. I did use the equations but I was having a hard time understanding in my mind the final values to plug in specifically for the final T value. I assumed it was referring to the final state so I plugged in 400 K. Please let me know if I made any mistakes.
Thanks again for the help.

n79Gj1d.jpg
 
Ok, you have to be careful when integrating. First with:
ΔV1-2-3 = (\frac{\partial V}{\partial T})P1 ΔT + (\frac{\partial V}{\partial P})T2 ΔP,
You get:
∫ΔV1-2-3 = Vfinal – Vinitial = ∫(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T})P1 ΔT +∫(\frac{\partial V}{\partial P})T2 ΔP = [V(P1,T2) – V(P1,T1)] + [V(T2,P2) – V(T2,P1)]
= R(\frac{ΔT}{P_{1}} + \frac{T_{2}}{P_{2}} – \frac{T_{2}}{P_{1}})

So you see that using integrations is purely formal here: at the end you don't have to differentiate or integrate anything.
Also, be careful with your units: atm is not a S.I. unit, so the gas constant must be adjusted if you use atms...
 
Goddar said:
Ok, you have to be careful when integrating. First with:
ΔV1-2-3 = (\frac{\partial V}{\partial T})P1 ΔT + (\frac{\partial V}{\partial P})T2 ΔP,
You get:
∫ΔV1-2-3 = Vfinal – Vinitial = ∫(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T})P1 ΔT +∫(\frac{\partial V}{\partial P})T2 ΔP = [V(P1,T2) – V(P1,T1)] + [V(T2,P2) – V(T2,P1)]
= R(\frac{ΔT}{P_{1}} + \frac{T_{2}}{P_{2}} – \frac{T_{2}}{P_{1}})

So you see that using integrations is purely formal here: at the end you don't have to differentiate or integrate anything.
Also, be careful with your units: atm is not a S.I. unit, so the gas constant must be adjusted if you use atms...

Ok thanks I'm going to take another look at what I did. Will post when I finish.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K