Show that there is a basis C of V so that C* = Λ

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between bases and dual bases in vector spaces, specifically showing that if $C$ is a basis of an $n$-dimensional $K$-vector space $V$, then its dual basis $C^{\star}$ can be expressed as $\Lambda$, where $\Lambda$ is another basis of the dual space $V^{\star}$. The transformation matrix $S$ from basis $B$ to $C$ is defined, and it is established that the inverse transpose of this matrix, denoted as $A$, serves as the transformation matrix from the dual basis $B^{\star}$ to $C^{\star}$. The conclusion is that there exists a basis $C$ such that $C^{\star} = \Lambda$, confirming the duality of bases in vector spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their dimensions
  • Familiarity with dual spaces and dual bases
  • Knowledge of matrix operations, specifically transposition and inversion
  • Comprehension of linear transformations between bases
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of dual spaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about the construction and properties of transformation matrices
  • Explore the implications of basis transformations in vector spaces
  • Investigate the relationship between linear forms and dual bases
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the theoretical foundations of vector spaces and duality in mathematics.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $K$ be a field and $V$ a $n$-dimensional $K$-vector space with basis $B=\{b_1, \ldots , b_n\}$. $V^{\star}$ is the dual space of $V$. $B^{\star}$ is the dual basis corresponding to $B$ of $V^{\star}$.

  1. Let $C=\{c_1, \ldots , c_n\}$ be an other basis of $V$ and $C^{\star}$ its dual basis. Let $S=(s_{ij})_{1\leq i,j\leq n}$ be the transformation matrix of basis from $B$ to $C$, i.e. $\displaystyle{c_j=\sum_{i=1}^ns_{ij}b_i}$ for $j\in \{1, \ldots , n\}$.
    Show that $(S^{-1})^T=:A=(a_{ij})_{1\leq i,j\leq n}$ is the transformation matrix of basis from $B^{\star}$ to $C^{\star}$ i.e. that $\displaystyle{c_j^{\star}=\sum_{i=1}^na_{ij}b_i^{\star}}$ for $j\in \{1, \ldots , n\}$.
  2. Let $\Lambda=\{\lambda_1, \ldots , \lambda_n\}$ a basis of the dual space $V^{\star}$.
    Show that there is a basis $C$ of $V$ so that $C^{\star}=\Lambda$.
I have done the following:
  1. We have that $A$ is the transformation matrix of basis from $B^{\star}$ to $C^{\star}$, i.e., that $\displaystyle{c_j^{\star}=\sum_{i=1}^na_{ij}b_i^{\star}}$ and we want to show that the transformation matrix is equal to $A:=\left (S^{-1}\right )^T$, right? (Wondering)

    We have the following:
    \begin{equation*}c_j^{\star}(c_k)=c_j^{\star}\left (\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}b_i\right )\ \overset{ c_j^{\star} \text{ linearform }}{ = } \ \sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}c_j^{\star}\left (b_i\right )=\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}\sum_{\lambda=1}^na_{\lambda j}b_{\lambda}^{\star}(b_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}\sum_{\lambda=1}^na_{\lambda j}\delta_{\lambda i}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}a_{i j}\end{equation*}

    From that we get $\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}a_{i j}=\delta_{jk}}$, since $c_j^{\star}(c_k)=\delta_{jk}$.

    From $\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i j}s_{ik}=\delta_{jk}}$ it follows that $\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{ji}^Ts_{ik}=\delta_{jk}}$.

    Since $\delta_{jk}=\begin{cases}1 & \text{ if } i=k \\0 & \text{ otherwise } \end{cases}$ it follows that we get the identity matrix.

    So we get $A^T\cdot S=I_n$.

    Therefore we have that \begin{equation*}A^T=S^{-1}\Rightarrow \left (A^T\right )^T=\left (S^{-1}\right )^T\Rightarrow A=\left (S^{-1}\right )^T\end{equation*}


    Is everything correct? (Wondering)
  2. Could you give me a hint for that? (Wondering)

    Do we maybe do the following?

    Let $M$ the transformation matrix of basis from $B^{\star}$ to $\Lambda$.
    Then do we get from the first question that $M=\left (S^{-1}\right )^T$ ? Or does this only hold for the specific basis $C^{\star}$ ?

    (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
I have done the following:
  1. We have that $A$ is the transformation matrix of basis from $B^{\star}$ to $C^{\star}$, i.e., that $\displaystyle{c_j^{\star}=\sum_{i=1}^na_{ij}b_i^{\star}}$ and we want to show that the transformation matrix is equal to $A:=\left (S^{-1}\right )^T$, right? (Wondering)

    We have the following:
    \begin{equation*}c_j^{\star}(c_k)=c_j^{\star}\left (\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}b_i\right )\ \overset{ c_j^{\star} \text{ linearform }}{ = } \ \sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}c_j^{\star}\left (b_i\right )=\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}\sum_{\lambda=1}^na_{\lambda j}b_{\lambda}^{\star}(b_i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}\sum_{\lambda=1}^na_{\lambda j}\delta_{\lambda i}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}a_{i j}\end{equation*}

    From that we get $\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{ik}a_{i j}=\delta_{jk}}$, since $c_j^{\star}(c_k)=\delta_{jk}$.

    From $\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i j}s_{ik}=\delta_{jk}}$ it follows that $\displaystyle{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{ji}^Ts_{ik}=\delta_{jk}}$.

    Since $\delta_{jk}=\begin{cases}1 & \text{ if } i=k \\0 & \text{ otherwise } \end{cases}$ it follows that we get the identity matrix.

    So we get $A^T\cdot S=I_n$.

    Therefore we have that \begin{equation*}A^T=S^{-1}\Rightarrow \left (A^T\right )^T=\left (S^{-1}\right )^T\Rightarrow A=\left (S^{-1}\right )^T\end{equation*}

Hey mathmari!

It seems correct to me. (Nod)

mathmari said:
2. Could you give me a hint for that? (Wondering)

Do we maybe do the following?

Let $M$ the transformation matrix of basis from $B^{\star}$ to $\Lambda$.
Then do we get from the first question that $M=\left (S^{-1}\right )^T$ ? Or does this only hold for the specific basis $C^{\star}$ ?

Isn't it that we can rather construct $S = (M^{-1})^T$ by the reverse argument of the first question? (Wondering)

$M$ must exist since $V^*$ is a vector space.
And with the constructed $S$ we can find a basis $C$ in $V$ that is the dual of $\Lambda$. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
Isn't it that we can rather construct $S = (M^{-1})^T$ by the reverse argument of the first question? (Wondering)

$M$ must exist since $V^*$ is a vector space.
And with the constructed $S$ we can find a basis $C$ in $V$ that is the dual of $\Lambda$. (Thinking)

Why must $M$ exist? Could you explain it further to me? (Wondering)

So $M$ is the transformation matrix of basis from $B^{\star}$ to $\Lambda$.

Let $S:=(M^{-1})^T$.

Let $C$ be the basis that we get by the transformation matrix $S$ from the basis $B$.

From the first question we have then that $\left (S^{-1}\right )^T$ is the transformation matrix of basis from the dual basis $B^{\star}$ to the dual basis $C^{\star}$. Since $\left (S^{-1}\right )^T=M$ and $M$ is the transformation matrix from $B^{\star}$ to $\Lambda$, it follows that $\Lambda=C^{\star}$. Is everything correct? Could we improve something? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Why must $M$ exist? Could you explain it further to me?

Lemma: The matrix for the transformation of a basis B to a basis C in a vector space must exist.
Proof: Observe that every basis vector in C must have a unique linear representation of basis vectors in B.
When we combine those linear representations into a matrix we have the matrix for the basis transformation. (Nerd)

mathmari said:
So $M$ is the transformation matrix of basis from $B^{\star}$ to $\Lambda$.

Let $S:=(M^{-1})^T$.

Let $C$ be the basis that we get by the transformation matrix $S$ from the basis $B$.

From the first question we have then that $\left (S^{-1}\right )^T$ is the transformation matrix of basis from the dual basis $B^{\star}$ to the dual basis $C^{\star}$. Since $\left (S^{-1}\right )^T=M$ and $M$ is the transformation matrix from $B^{\star}$ to $\Lambda$, it follows that $\Lambda=C^{\star}$.

Is everything correct? Could we improve something?

It looks fine to me. (Nod)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K