Show that wave packet is an eigenstate to operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a Gaussian wave packet is an eigenstate of the lowering operator \(\hat{a}\) in the context of quantum harmonic oscillators. The wave packet is defined as \(\Psi(x)=\left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)}\). The eigenvalue equation \(\hat{a}|\Psi\rangle = \alpha |\Psi\rangle\) is explored, with the operator \(\hat{a}\) expressed in terms of position and momentum operators. The discussion reveals a common mistake in the application of the operator, specifically neglecting the position variable in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically harmonic oscillators.
  • Familiarity with operators in quantum mechanics, particularly the raising and lowering operators \(\hat{a}\) and \(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\).
  • Knowledge of Gaussian wave packets and their mathematical representation.
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly differentiation and integration in the context of wave functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of eigenstates and eigenvalues in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of the harmonic oscillator's wave functions.
  • Explore the implications of the uncertainty principle in relation to wave packets.
  • Investigate the role of the position and momentum operators in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists working with harmonic oscillators, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum states and operators.

Bapelsin
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Show that wave packet is an eigenstate to operator [SOLVED]

Homework Statement



For a harmonic oscillator we can define the step up and down operators \hat{a} and \hat{a}^{\dagger} and their action as

\hat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}+\frac{\imath}{m\omega}\hat{p}) \quad \hat{a}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle

\hat{a}^{\dagger}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}-\frac{\imath}{m\omega}\hat{p}) \quad \hat{a}^{\dagger}|n\rangle = \sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle

Show that the Gaussian wave-packet

\Psi(x)=\left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)}

is an eigenstate to \hat{a} with eigenvalue \alpha.
\hat{a}|a\rangle = \alpha | a\rangle

Express the eigenvalue in terms of x_t and p_t.

Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



\hat{p} \rightarrow -i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x}

gives the expression for

\hat{a}=\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}(\hat{x}+\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}\frac{\partial}{\partial x})

\hat{a}|\Psi\rangle = \sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}} \left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4}\left(e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)} + \frac{\hbar}{m\omega}(-\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}(x-x_t)+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}(x-x_t)^2+\frac{\imath}{\hbar}p_t(x-x_t)})\right) = <br /> \Psi\sqrt{\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(1+(x-x_t)+\frac{\imath}{m\omega}p_t\right)

which is obviously not a scalar times \Psi.

What am I doing wrong here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You forgot the x in the first term in parentheses (which comes from the x operator multiplied by Psi).

Here, cut out the clutter (h is supposed to be hbar in what follows):

C = (mω/h)1/2

A = (h/mω)

Then:

a|Ψ> = C(x + A ∂/∂x)Ψ

= C(xΨ + A∂Ψ/∂x)

= C(xΨ + A[(-mω/h)(x-xt) + (i/h)pt]Ψ)

=C(xΨ + A[-A-1xΨ + A-1xtΨ + (i/h)ptΨ])

See anything that might cancel?
 
Yes. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K