Show the drift velocity is ExB/B^2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The drift velocity of a charged particle in uniform electric field E and magnetic field B is defined by the equation vd = (E × B) / B². This relationship arises from the balance of forces acting on the particle, where the Lorentz force F = e(E + v × B) equals zero under uniform motion. The discussion emphasizes the assumption of two-dimensional drift, clarifying that motion in the third dimension does not contribute to drift but may represent acceleration in a medium. Understanding this concept is crucial for analyzing particle dynamics in electromagnetic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz force and its components
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and cross products
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic theory, particularly electric and magnetic fields
  • Basic principles of particle motion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lorentz force law in detail
  • Explore vector identities and their applications in physics
  • Learn about particle dynamics in electromagnetic fields using simulations
  • Investigate the implications of drift velocity in plasma physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism or particle dynamics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the behavior of charged particles in electromagnetic fields.

shedrick94
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
HW Template missing as it was moved from another forum
A charged particle drifts in uniform, constant magnetic and electric fields. The electric field, E, is perpendicular to the magnetic field, B.

Show that the drift velocity is given by vd = (E×B)/B2

Heres where I get to:
F=e(E+vxB)=0 as v is uniform.Therefore E+vxB=0.

Take vector product of B with both sides.

BxE +Bx(vxB)=0.

Using identity Ax(BxC) = B(A.C)-C(A.B)

I get BxE+v(B.B)-B(B.v)=0
Then I don't know where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can assume that the drift happens in two dimensions, so you can say something about the relative direction of v and B which simplifies (B.v).
In three dimensions the total velocity does not have to follow the initial equation, so you need that assumption.
 
mfb said:
You can assume that the drift happens in two dimensions, so you can say something about the relative direction of v and B which simplifies (B.v).
In three dimensions the total velocity does not have to follow the initial equation, so you need that assumption.
Why are you allowed to assume the drift is in two dimensions though?
 
The component in the third dimension is not a drift.
 
mfb said:
The component in the third dimension is not a drift.
Would that be an acceleration then?
 
A motion in the third direction would stop quickly in matter. In vacuum, the charged particle could freely keep moving in that direction, without influencing the two-dimensional motion in the other directions.
 
mfb said:
A motion in the third direction would stop quickly in matter. In vacuum, the charged particle could freely keep moving in that direction, without influencing the two-dimensional motion in the other directions.
Can I ask what it means by a drift velocity then?
 
The velocity in the two-dimensional plane I mentioned.
 
mfb said:
The velocity in the two-dimensional plane I mentioned.
yes but what does it specifically mean by 'drift'. You said the velocity in the 3rd dimension is not a drift.
 
  • #10
I guess it is just convention to call that drift.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
746
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K