Showing a complicated mess is equal to cot(z)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nathan12343
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a complex function f(z) whose real part is given by a specific expression involving sine and hyperbolic cosine functions. The context is within complex analysis, particularly focusing on the properties of analytic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the function f(z) and whether it is analytic on the entire complex plane or a subset. There are attempts to manipulate the expression into a recognizable form, with some participants expressing confusion about the relevance of certain transformations.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaged in exploring different approaches to the problem, with hints and suggestions being shared. There is an ongoing examination of the relationships between various expressions, but no consensus has been reached regarding the best method to simplify or prove the original statement.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the potential for multiple functions to share the same real part, which raises questions about the uniqueness of the solution. Participants also note the complexity of the problem and the challenges faced in deriving the desired form without computational tools.

nathan12343
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the function f(z) whose real part is

\frac{sin(x)}{cosh(2y)-cos(2x)}

where z = x + iy

Homework Equations



I already know f(z)=cot(z), using FullSimplify[] in mathematica on the expression I get for u + iv when I apply the Cauchy-Reimann equations.

More explicitly,

f(x,y) = u(x,y)+iv(x,y) = \frac{-sin(2x)+isinh(2y)}{cos(2x)-cosh(2y)}

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried to derive without mathematica that this is cot(z) about a thousand different ways. I can't seem to manipulate the expression into a usable form. Am I missing something obvious?

Help!

Thanks!

-Nathan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There can exist an infinite number of functions having that real part. Do you mean a function analytic on the entire complex plane?
 
Yes, a function analytic on a certain subset of the complex plane.
 
Hi Nathan! :smile:

Hint:

\frac{1\ -\ i\,cot(z)}{1\ +\ i\,cot(z)} = … ? :smile:
 
I'm sorry, Tiny Tim, I don't see how that helps me:

I get,

<br /> \frac{1\ -\ i\,cot(z)}{1\ +\ i\,cot(z)} = -(Cos(2z)+Sin(2z))<br />

What does that have to do with reducing what I found above?
 
nathan12343 said:
I get,
\frac{1\ -\ i\,cot(z)}{1\ +\ i\,cot(z)} = -(Cos(2z)+Sin(2z))

Hi Nathan! :smile:

How did you get that? :confused:

I get \frac{1\ -\ i\,cot(z)}{1\ +\ i\,cot(z)}\ =\ \frac{sin(z)\ -\ i\,cos(z)}{sin(z)\ +\ i\,cos(z)} = … ? :smile:
 
Thanks for the help, tiny-tim

I think I dropped an i

<br /> \frac{1\ -\ i\,cot(z)}{1\ +\ i\,cot(z)}\ =\ \frac{sin(z)\ -\ i\,cos(z)}{sin(z)\ +\ i\,cos(z)} = sin^2(z) - cos^2(z) - 2isin(z)cos(z) = -(cos(2z) + i sin(2z)) = -e^{2iz}<br />

But I still don't see how this helps me with my original problem...
 
nathan12343 said:
Thanks for the help, tiny-tim

I think I dropped an i

\frac{1\ -\ i\,cot(z)}{1\ +\ i\,cot(z)}\ =\ \frac{sin(z)\ -\ i\,cos(z)}{sin(z)\ +\ i\,cos(z)} = sin^2(z) - cos^2(z) - 2isin(z)cos(z) = -(cos(2z) + i sin(2z)) = -e^{2iz}

hmm … quicker would be …
\frac{1\ -\ i\,cot(z)}{1\ +\ i\,cot(z)}\ =\ \frac{sin(z)\ -\ i\,cos(z)}{sin(z)\ +\ i\,cos(z)}\ =\ -\frac{i\,e^{iz}}{i\,e{-iz}}\ =\ -e^{2iz}
But I still don't see how this helps me with my original problem...
You wanted to prove that cot(z) = \frac{-sin(2x)+isinh(2y)}{cos(2x)-cosh(2y)} …

just plug that into the above formula. :wink:
 
Last edited:
Wow, that was a really hard problem...

Thanks, for the help, tiny-tim!

If you wouldn't mind my asking, how did you come up with that?
 
  • #10
nathan12343 said:
If you wouldn't mind my asking, how did you come up with that?

erm … I'm familiar with (1 + tanhz)/(1 - tanhz) = e2z

(as you should be! :wink:)

so I just used iz instead of z. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K