Showing a function in R2 is unbounded (no least upper bound)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that a given function, f(x,y) = (x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2 - 4, is unbounded by showing it has no absolute maximum. Participants are exploring the implications of the function's structure and its relationship to boundedness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss constructing sequences of points to show unboundedness and question the adequacy of their chosen sequences. There is a focus on whether the function can be bounded above based on its derived expressions.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the function's properties are being explored, with some participants suggesting that if a related function is unbounded, then the original function must also be unbounded. Guidance is being offered in the form of examples and questions to stimulate further reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of reducing the function to a single variable and question the necessity of such a step. There is a sense of missing information regarding the construction of sequences and the overall proof strategy.

cantidosan
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that this function has no absolute max by showing that it is unbounded

Homework Equations


f(x,y) = (x-1)^2 + (y+2)^2 -4

The Attempt at a Solution


my initial idea is to construct a sequence of points {(xk, yk)} so that the sequence {f(xk, yk)} becomes unbounded.

to show that : Let M=f(x,y)
∨M>0 ∃xk, yk s.t xk,yk∉ B(M,(1,-2)). This issue i have is determining an adequate sequence of values to use.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Observe that f(x,y) \geq (x - 1)^2 -4. Is that bounded above?
 
pasmith said:
Observe that f(x,y) \geq (x - 1)^2 -4. Is that bounded above?
I'm assuming by f(x,y) you're referring to the original equation and no it isn't bounded above. I'm sorry, i have a feeling I'm supposed to make some intellectual leap with that example,but I am still somewhat lost.
 
pasmith said:
Observe that f(x,y) \geq (x - 1)^2 -4. Is that bounded above?
Actually, i noticed that you reduced it to a single variable? To what end?
 
If (x - 1)^2 - 4 is not bounded above, and f(x,y) \geq (x-1)^2 -4, can it be the case that f(x,y) is bounded above?
 
cantidosan said:
I'm assuming by f(x,y) you're referring to the original equation and no it isn't bounded above. I'm sorry, i have a feeling I'm supposed to make some intellectual leap with that example,but I am still somewhat lost.

Perhaps this will help, but I'm not sure:

Can you think of any function (even of a single variable) that is not bounded above?
 
PeroK said:
Perhaps this will help, but I'm not sure:

Can you think of any function (even of a single variable) that is not bounded above?

f(x,y) = X^2 for instance, For the sake of a concrete proof. Would it be sufficient to say that if f(x) is unbounded and f(x,y) >f(x) then f(x,y) is also unbounded. Seems incomplete, or have we just skimmed the surface in terms of reasoning?
 
cantidosan said:
f(x,y) = X^2 for instance, For the sake of a concrete proof. Would it be sufficient to say that if f(x) is unbounded and f(x,y) >f(x) then f(x,y) is also unbounded. Seems incomplete, or have we just skimmed the surface in terms of reasoning?

Ok, so you know that ##f(x) = x^2## is not bounded above. What about ##f(x) = (x-1)^2##? Not bounded above?
 
The sequence or points (1, 1), (2, 2), ..., (n, n) for any integer n leaps out at you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K