MHB Showing Connexity of $f(K)$ for Continuous $f$ on Connexe $K$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Julio1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Julio1
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Let $f: K\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$ continuous, $K$ an connexe subset. Show that $f(K)$ is connexe.
Hello :). Any ideas for this problem? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Julio said:
Let $f: K\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n\to \mathbb{R}$ continuous, $K$ an connexe subset. Show that $f(K)$ is connexe.
Hello :). Any ideas for this problem? Thanks :)
I would do this by contradiction. Suppose that $f(K)$ is not connected. Then it can be written as the disjoint union of two nonempty open subsets, $U$ and $V$ say. You need to show that $K$ is the disjoint union of the nonempty open sets $f^{-1}(U)$ and $f^{-1}(V)$. That contradicts the fact that $K$ is connected.
 
Last edited:
Another way to show that $f(K)$ is connected is by proving that the only nonempty, open and closed subset of $f(K)$ is $f(K)$ itself. So let $A$ be a nonempty subset of $f(K)$ that is open and closed. Using continuity of $f$ and the fact that $A \subset f(K)$, show that $f^{-1}(A)$ is a nonempty, open and closed subset of $K$. Since $K$ is connected, $f^{-1}(A) = K$. Thus $f(K) = f(f^{-1}(A)) \subset A$, showing that $f(K) = A$.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K