Showing Difference of Relatively Prime Polynomials is Irreducible

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the polynomial \( f - yg \) is irreducible in the polynomial ring \( K(y)[x] \) when \( f \) and \( g \) are relatively prime polynomials in \( K[x] \). The proof utilizes the existence of polynomials \( a, b \in K[x] \) such that \( af + bg = 1 \) and applies the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials. A contradiction arises when assuming \( f - yg \) is reducible, leading to the conclusion that \( f - yg \) cannot belong to the original ring of polynomials if \( y \notin K \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial rings, specifically \( K[x] \) and \( K(y)[x] \).
  • Familiarity with the concept of relatively prime polynomials.
  • Knowledge of the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials.
  • Basic understanding of irreducibility in the context of polynomial algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of polynomial rings, particularly \( K[y][x] \).
  • Learn about irreducibility criteria for polynomials in multiple variables.
  • Explore the application of the Euclidean algorithm in polynomial factorization.
  • Investigate the implications of polynomial coefficients being constants versus variables.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for algebra students, mathematicians studying polynomial theory, and educators teaching concepts of irreducibility and polynomial rings.

slamminsammya
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let K be a field, and f,g are relatively prime in K[x]. Show that f-yg is irreducible in K(y)[x].


Homework Equations


There exist polynomials a,b\in K[x] such that af+bg=u where u\in K. We also have the Euclidean algorithm for polynomials.


The Attempt at a Solution


Assuming towards a contradiction that f-yg were reducible, we have f-yg=hk where h,k\in K(y)[x] are not units. Then by the relative primacy condition we also have af+bg=1, so that multiplying both sides by hk yields hk(af+bg)=hk=f-yg, but this is a contradiction since f-yg is certainly not in our original ring of polynomials (assuming that y\notin K), but the left hand side is most certainly in the original ring. The problem is I don't feel confident at all in this argument. I am having trouble conceptualizing what f-yg is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
slamminsammya said:
...multiplying both sides by hk yields hk(af+bg)=hk=f-yg, but this is a contradiction since f-yg is certainly not in our original ring of polynomials (assuming that y\notin K),
Correct.
slamminsammya said:
but the left hand side is most certainly in the original ring.
This is incorrect. Each part of the equation hk(af+bg)=hk=f-yg was derived by directly applying noncontradictory definitions (namely (i) af+bg := 1 and (ii) hk := f-yg), so you won't be able to get a contradiction without doing something else.
 
slamminsammya said:
The problem is I don't feel confident at all in this argument. I am having trouble conceptualizing what f-yg is.

Think of y as a constant (which is what it is). It might help to use a different letter, say \alpha, instead of y for the time being so you don't accidentally forget it's not a variable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K