Showing every free module is Projective

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phillips101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    module
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that any free module P over an arbitrary ring is projective, using the definition of projective modules involving surjective homomorphisms. Participants clarify the definition of projective modules, emphasizing the need for a homomorphism h that works for all choices of M, N, f, and g, rather than just one specific case. There is a debate about the implications of the definitions, particularly regarding the projectivity of modules over Principal Ideal Domains and the characteristics of free modules. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the order of quantifiers in definitions and the potential confusion that can arise from it. Ultimately, the participants express gratitude for the clarification and plan to revisit the problem with a better understanding.
Phillips101
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Take P a free module over an arbitrary ring. Show P is projective.

Definition of Projective:
If f: M-->N and g: P-->N are module homomorphisms with f surjective, then if P is projective there exists homomorphism h such that h: P-->M with f(h(x))=g(x) for all x.

Obviously f has a right inverse, and so it is easy to find an h that works, but not a homomorphism h that works. I really have no idea about this and help would be appreciated.

Second bit:

Conversely, show that if P is a projective module over a Principal Ideal Domain, then P is free.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the definition of projective wrong:
P is projective iff:
For all homomorphisms f:M->N and g:P->N:
If f is surjective, then:
There exists a homomorphism h:P->M with fh = g​

Anyways, isn't the set of all homomorphisms P->M easy to describe, when P is free?
 
I can't see a difference between our definitions, but yours is certainly clearer.

I don't know what that would be. I'd hazard a guess at matrices, but surely that relies on M being free as well?
 
I hate to just blurt out the answer to my question -- it's probably the most important property of free modules and I want to give you a chance to recall it, but anyways...

If F is the free module on a set X of generators, then any function X-->M uniquely extends to module homomorphism F-->M. Conversely, any module homomorphism F-->M is completely determined by its values on X



The difference between the definitions we gave is the order of quantifiers. e.g. by your definition, Z/2 would be a projective module over Z, as follows:

Let M = Z/2 and N = Z/2.
Let f:M->N and g:P->N be the identity homomorphisms.
Note that f is surjective.
Your definition says that I can now prove P projective, by letting h:P->M be the identity, because fh=g.

However, the correct definition is univerally quantified over M,N,f, and g. I don't have to be able to find an h for just one particular choice of M,N,f,g -- I have to be able to find an h for every choice of M,N,f,g.
 
About the spoiler; I didn't cover that in my course, I just checked my notes. But, it is fairly 'obvious' when you consider vector spaces, so I suppose I was just supposed to deduce it.

And I see the difference now.

Thanks for the help, I'll have another go at the problem.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
878
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K