Showing this Euler's equation with a homogeneous function via the chain rule

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
15 replies · 5K views
lo2
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok I have this general homogeneous function, which is a [itex]C^1[/itex] function:

[itex]f(tx,ty)=t^k f(x,y)[/itex]

And then I have to show that this function satisfies this Euler equation:

[itex]x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)[/itex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I have tried to take the derivative, and I get:

[itex]x(1\cdot t+1\cdot 0) + y(1\cdot 0+1\cdot t)=xt+yt[/itex]

But that does not really do the trick, so am I on the right way? And if so what more should I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Differentiate f(tx, ty) with respect to t
 
clamtrox said:
Differentiate f(tx, ty) with respect to t

But I have this equation:

[itex]x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)[/itex]

Where I have to differentiate first with regards to x and then y. So am I not sure I can see how I should just differentiate with regards to t.
 
lo2 said:
But I have this equation:

[itex]x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)[/itex]

Where I have to differentiate first with regards to x and then y. So am I not sure I can see how I should just differentiate with regards to t.

It's a straightforward application of the chain rule... ∂f(tx,ty)/∂t = ∂f(tx,ty)/∂(tx) ∂(tx)/∂t + ∂f(tx,ty)/∂(ty) ∂(ty)/∂t ...

After you got that, then differentiate the other side, tk f(x,y) and then consider what happens when t→1.
 
clamtrox said:
It's a straightforward application of the chain rule... ∂f(tx,ty)/∂t = ∂f(tx,ty)/∂(tx) ∂(tx)/∂t + ∂f(tx,ty)/∂(ty) ∂(ty)/∂t ...

After you got that, then differentiate the other side, tk f(x,y) and then consider what happens when t→1.

Ok so I get this when I differentiate [itex]f(xt,yt)[/itex]:

[itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(xt,yt) = 1\cdot x + 1\cdot y = x + y[/itex]

But I am not sure how to differentiate:

[itex]t^k f(x,y)[/itex]

Shall I once again differentiate with regards to t?
 
lo2 said:
Ok so I get this when I differentiate [itex]f(xt,yt)[/itex]:

[itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(xt,yt) = 1\cdot x + 1\cdot y = x + y[/itex]

That is not right. Can you understand the formula in my previous post? That tells you how it goes.

lo2 said:
But I am not sure how to differentiate:

[itex]t^k f(x,y)[/itex]

Shall I once again differentiate with regards to t?

Yes... The point is to keep the equality
f(tx, ty) = tk f(x,y), therefore
∂f(tx, ty)/ ∂t = ∂/∂t (tk f(x,y))
 
clamtrox said:
That is not right. Can you understand the formula in my previous post? That tells you how it goes.

Well I guess not, I am not sure what this differentiates up to be:

[itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial tx}(tx,ty)[/itex]

The other one I think I got correct?

[itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(tx) = x[/itex]
 
I do not want to seem rude.

But might someone else perhaps chip in with a little bit of help?

Would be most appreciated! :)
 
lo2 said:
Well I guess not, I am not sure what this differentiates up to be:

[itex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial tx}(tx,ty)[/itex]

Yeah I guess that looks a little tricky. If you want, you can also write it as [itex]\frac{\partial f(a,b)}{\partial a}[/itex] evaluated at a=tx.
 
clamtrox said:
Yeah I guess that looks a little tricky. If you want, you can also write it as [itex]\frac{\partial f(a,b)}{\partial a}[/itex] evaluated at a=tx.

Well I must admit that I am still not sure how to compute that.

As you do not know what the function is, and thereby I find it hard differentiate...
 
Ok I think I have got something:

If we first differentiate

[itex]f(tx,ty)[/itex]

We get:

[itex]x\frac{\partial f}{\partial xt}(xt,yt)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial yt}(xt,yt)[/itex]

And since this has to be equal to

[itex]k\cdot f(x,y)[/itex]

We have that

[itex]t^k[/itex]

Can only be a constant when [itex]t=1[/itex], so if we do that we get:

[itex]\frac{df}{dt}=x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=1^k f(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)[/itex]
 
Ok well I kind of have to go soon, so if you would please have a short glance at my suggested solution, I would be more than happy!
 
I couldn't quite follow that last post. Are we sure you are not assuming there what you have to prove?

I may have a mental blockage; am not sure that you can or are meant to prove 2 from 1.

The only 'homogeneous functions' I know are homogeneous polynomials which are things of form

f(x, y) = Ʃ arxryk-r (r from 0 to k)

Get the two derivatives of that and you'll see it's easy.
 
Last edited:
epenguin said:
I couldn't quite follow that last post. Are we sure you are not assuming there what you have to prove?

I may have a mental blockage; am not sure that you can or are meant to prove 2 from 1.

The only 'homogeneous functions' I know are homogeneous polynomials which are things of form

f(x, y) = Ʃ arxryk-r (r from 0 to k)

Get the two derivatives of that and you'll see it's easy.


Ok well I am not exactly sure what you mean here, but if you are asking what it is I need to show then it is:

I have this general homogeneous function, which is a [itex]C^1[/itex] function:

[itex]f(tx,ty)=t^k f(x,y)[/itex]

And then I have to show that this function satisfies this Euler equation:

[itex]x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)[/itex]
 
lo2 said:
We get:

[itex]x\frac{\partial f}{\partial xt}(xt,yt)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial yt}(xt,yt)[/itex]
Good!

lo2 said:
And since this has to be equal to

[itex]k\cdot f(x,y)[/itex]

No! :) It has to be equal to k tk-1 f(x,y). This has to hold for any value of t, and in particular for t=1, which is the case you're interested in.
 
Ah yeah ok, thanks a lot for the help! :)